Objective To investigate the effects of psychological nursing on patients with acute pyelonephritis. Methods 96 pa-tients with acute pyelonephritis admitted in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2015 were randomly divided into observa-tion group and control group, 48 cases in each group. Both groups were treated by the conventional and comprehensive medication. The control group received usual care, the observation group received psychological care on the basis of usual care. And the clini-cal effect and nursing efficacy of the two groups were compared. Results The cure rate was higher in the observation group than that in the control group (70.83%vs 60.42%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05);the overall response rate was higher in the observation group than that in the control group (95.83% vs 89.58%), but the difference was not statistically sig-nificant (P>0.05). The length of stay was much shorter in the observation group than that in the control group [(15.32 ±6.24)d vs (21.43±8.32)d], (P<0.05). After nursing, the SDS and SAS scores decreased significantly in both groups compared with those before nursing, moreover, the SDS and SAS scores of the observation group were much lower than those of the control group(P<0.05). The observation group had obviously higher nursing satisfaction (93.75%vs 81.25%) (P<0.05). Conclusion Psychological care applied to the clinical treatment and nursing for acute pyelonephritis, can promote the rehabilitation and improve the mental state and clinical outcomes of the patients, so it is worthy of application and promotion.%目的 探讨心理护理在急性肾盂肾炎患者中的应用效果. 方法 整群选取2013年1月—2015年1月该院收治的急性肾盂肾炎患者96例,随机分为观察组与对照组,每组48例. 两组均实施常规综合药物治疗,对照组实施常规护理,观察组在对照组的加强心理护理,对比两组的临床疗效与护理效果. 结果 观察组的治愈率及总有效率分别为70.83%、95.83%,高于对照组的60.42%、89.58%,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组的住院时间为(15.32±6.24)d,相比于对照组的(21.43± 8.32)d显著缩短(P<0.05);护理后两组的SDS及SAS评分均显著降低,且观察组显著低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组的护理满意度为93.75%,显著高于对照组的81.25%(P<0.05). 结论 在急性肾盂肾炎的临床治疗护理中介入心理护理,能够促进患者的病情康复,改善患者的心理状态及临床预后,值得推广应用.
展开▼
