Objective To analyze and evaluate the clinical value of two methods of examination in the diagnosis of emergency abdominal trauma patients with B ultrasound examination and CT examination. Methods From May 2015 to October 2017, 30 emergency patients with abdominal trauma received in our hospital and received clinical treatment were selected as the study subjects. B ultrasound and CT examination were performed on 30 patients, and the clinical diagnosis effect of 30 patients was statistically concerned. Results The diagnosis rate of 30 patients was 93.33% by surgical pathological exploration, and 34 sites were detected in abdominal visceral injuries. There was no significant difference in the accuracy rate between B-mode ultrasound and CT (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the number of spleen injury, liver injury, kidney injury, small intestine or duodenum injury, pancreas injury and peritoneal hematoma between B-ultrasound and CT (P > 0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound examination and CT examination in the diagnosis of patients with acute abdominal trauma showed good results and showed important clinical value.%目的 将B超检查方法和CT检查方法运用在急诊腹部创伤患者的诊断中,分析以及评价两种检查方法的临床价值.方法 选取2015年5月—2017年10月本医院收入且予以临床治疗的30例急诊腹部创伤患者作为研究对象,对30例患者均实施B超检查和CT检查,统计并关注30例患者的临床诊断效果.结果 30例患者经由手术病理探查确诊率为93.33%,腹内脏器损伤的部位共检出34处.B超与CT诊断准确率比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);B超与CT检查脾损伤检出数目、肝损伤检出数目、肾脏损伤检出数目、小肠或是十二指肠损伤检出数目、胰腺损伤检出数目、腹膜血肿检出数目比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 在急诊腹部创伤患者的诊断中采取B超检查方法和CT检查方法均呈现良好效果,展示重要临床价值.
展开▼
