不同心肺复苏程序对院前急救心脏骤停影响的分析

摘要

Objective Analysis of different programs for pre-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in cardiac arrest emergency affected. Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinical data before the November 2013 November -2014 our hospital 128 cases of hospital cardiac arrest patients, according to the number table, patients were divided into two groups, study groups using the bag-mask ventilation recovery method, the control group resuscitation, resuscitation success rate between the two groups and the recovery time with tracheal intubation. Results Study group of patients CPR 37.50% probability of success than the control group, 21.87 percent, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Bag-mask ventilation method is more intubated ventilation method better efifcacy and a higher success rate.%目的 分析不同心肺复苏程序对院前急救心脏骤停影响.方法回顾性分析2013年11月~2014年11月本院收治的128例院前心脏停博患者的临床资料,按照数字表法将患者分成两组,研究组采用气囊面罩通气法进行复苏,对照组采用气管插管法进行复苏,比较两组复苏成功率及复苏时间.结果 研究组患者心肺复苏成功几率37.50%优于对照组21.87%,比较差异均具统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 气囊面罩通气法较气管插管通气法疗效更佳,且成功率更高.