氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘对比分析

摘要

Objective Comparative analysis of oxygen atomizing inhalation and air compressor pump atomizing inhalation in the treatment of pediatric asthma.Methods62 cases of children with asthma treated in our hospital as the object of study, random grouping, each of 31 cases. The control group was treated with air compressor pump atomizing inhalation, the study group was treated with oxygen atomizing inhalation. The clinical effect and length of stay of two groups were statistically analyzed.Results The total effective rate of the control group was 74.2% lower than the research group 96.8%, the difference between the two groups was signiifcant (P<0.05), In the control group, the hospitalization time (7.8±3.7) days, was higher than the study group (5.0±2.3) d, the difference was signiifcant between the two groups (P<0.05).Conclusion The treatment of children asthma with oxygen atomizing inhalation can improve the clinical effect, shorten the length of hospital stay.%目的：对比分析氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘。方法将我院收治的62例哮喘患儿作为对象进行研究，随机分组，各31例。对照组应用空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗，研究组应用氧驱动雾化吸入治疗。统计两组患儿临床效果及住院时间。结果对照组患儿临床总有效率74.2%，低于研究组的96.8%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；对照组患儿住院时间（7.8±3.7）d，高于研究组的（5.0±2.3） d，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论氧驱动雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘可提高其临床效果，缩短患儿住院时间。