首页> 外文学位 >Preface to Herodotus: The Prehistory of Prose in the Archaic Age
【24h】

Preface to Herodotus: The Prehistory of Prose in the Archaic Age

机译:希罗多德序言:古代散文的史前史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Classical scholarship holds ancient Greek prose literature to have originated in the archaic period in the imposing shadow of Greek verse, primitive and derivative in form, and subservient in status. If this were so, the Greeks would have had little reason to begin writing prose. This dissertation is devoted to answering the question why they did, and argues that the traditional view of the rise of Greek prose is skewed by the western concept of prose. Archaic Greek society did not have a concept of "prose", and certainly didn't consider the prose it produced "prosaic".The confused narrative of the rise of Greek prose results from a similarly confused understanding of the term "prose" in the western tradition, which is typically taken for granted. The introduction discusses the term and advocates taking a pragmatic approach to "prose", as a language used in situations of distance, concrete and abstract, rather than the traditional rhetorical understanding of it as Kunstprosa, language boasting rhetorical figures. In so doing it lays the groundwork for uncovering antecedent cultures of prose which render the composition and reception of archaic prose intelligible. Chapter 1 argues for the existence of vibrant traditions of oral prose which produced specimens of verbal art endowed with commanding authority. Chapter 2 studies the prose of the earliest Greek alphabetic writing, preserved in inscriptions, and finds it to furnish further evidence for the vitality of oral prose traditions in archaic Greece. Chapter 3 then proceeds to examine a particular kind of written prose which later came to be considered "literary", and makes the case that what was new in the sixth century BCE was not literary texts in prose, but the practice of attributing texts in prose – and verse – to authors. The language of these texts, in prose no less than in verse, was deeply traditional and highly authoritative. Finally, the epilogue points the way forward to a consideration of the question how the concept of prose later emerged, that is to say how ancient Greek prose came to be "prose".
机译:古典学术认为古希腊散文文学起源于古希腊诗歌的雄伟阴影下,形式原始且衍生,地位从属。如果是这样,希腊人就没有理由开始写散文了。这篇论文致力于回答他们为什么这样做的问题,并认为希腊散文兴起的传统观点被西方的散文概念所扭曲。古希腊社会没有“散文”的概念,当然也不认为它产生的散文是“平淡无奇的”。希腊散文兴起的混乱叙述是由于西方传统中对“散文”一词的类似困惑理解造成的,这通常被认为是理所当然的。引言讨论了这个词,并主张对“散文”采取务实的方法,作为一种用于距离、具体和抽象的语言,而不是传统的修辞学理解为 Kunstprosa,即夸耀修辞手法的语言。这样做为揭示散文的前身文化奠定了基础,这些文化使古代散文的创作和接受变得易于理解。第 1 章论证了充满活力的口头散文传统的存在,这些传统产生了被赋予指挥权威的口头艺术标本。第 2 章研究了保存在铭文中的最早希腊字母文字的散文,发现它为古希腊口头散文传统的活力提供了进一步的证据。然后,第 3 章继续研究了一种后来被认为是“文学”的特殊书面散文,并指出公元前 6 世纪的新事物不是散文中的文学文本,而是将散文和诗歌中的文本归于作者的做法。这些文本的语言,无论是散文还是诗歌,都非常传统且具有高度权威性。最后,结语指出了思考散文概念后来是如何出现的问题,即古希腊散文是如何成为“散文”的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fassberg, Teddy Jonathan.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton University.;

    Princeton University.;

    Princeton University.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton University.;Princeton University.;Princeton University.;
  • 学科 Classical studies.
  • 学位
  • 年度 2020
  • 页码 212
  • 总页数 212
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Classical studies.;

    机译:古典研究。;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号