首页> 外文学位 >Measuring the Testing Mode in General Chemistry: The Effect of Computer Versus Paper Mode on Test Performance, Cognitive Load, and Scratch Paper
【24h】

Measuring the Testing Mode in General Chemistry: The Effect of Computer Versus Paper Mode on Test Performance, Cognitive Load, and Scratch Paper

机译:测量常规化学中的测试模式:计算机对纸模式对测试性能,认知负荷和草稿纸的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this dissertation was to study the effect of testing mode (giving a test on computer versus paper) in authentic classroom environments. Specifically, this work sought to broaden the pedagogical implications of testing mode by examining variations between computer and paper mode in student test performance, cognitive load, and use of scratch paper. Data were collected from students who were enrolled in undergraduate general chemistry courses. Students took multiple proctored general chemistry tests that included a variety of chemistry topics and three question types: algorithmic, conceptual, and definition. After each test students were provided with correct-answer feedback. The tests were either graded and part of the class (i.e., class quizzes) or served as a practice test for the upcoming test in the course. To measure testing mode, tests were delivered on computer or paper, forming four conditions. The conditions, defined by the mode of the initial and final test, were: Computer - Computer, Computer - Paper, Paper - Computer, and Paper - Paper conditions. A series of studies were conducted and their findings are presented in three separate articles. Article 1 discusses test performance of two groups of students (N = 207 and N = 215) who took two similar practice tests in one session. Article 2 discusses test performance of new students (N = 221) who took two quizzes in class on Day 1 and Day 8 and one practice test on Day 12. Article 3 examines testing mode with students (N = 221) who reported their cognitive load and provided scratch paper. The results revealed that overall there seems to be little difference between online and paper-based testing. No significant differences were found in student test performance nor in the cognitive load measures between the computer and paper modes. However, a significant difference between two modes was detected with use of scratch paper, though the effect was very small (eta2 = .04). Although students used scratch paper more when taking a chemistry test on paper than online, it is not clear whether the difference of approximately one question represents any practical significance. The present dissertation supports the conclusion that online testing is a promising alternative to the traditional paper-and-pencil mode most often used in general chemistry courses and changing from paper to online mode would not impose an additional cognitive load on students.
机译:本文的目的是研究在真实的课堂环境中测试模式(在计算机和纸上进行测试)的效果。具体来说,这项工作试图通过检查学生考试成绩,认知负荷和便签纸的计算机模式和纸质模式之间的差异来扩大测试模式的教学意义。数据是从就读本科化学课程的学生中收集的。学生参加了多个督导的普通化学测试,其中包括各种化学主题和三种问题类型:算法,概念和定义。每次测试后,都会为学生提供正确答案的反馈。这些考试已评分并属于班级的一部分(即班级测验),或作为即将进行的课程考试的实践考试。为了测量测试模式,在计算机或纸上进行测试,形成四个条件。由初始测试和最终测试的模式定义的条件为:计算机-计算机,计算机-纸张,纸张-计算机和纸张-纸张条件。进行了一系列研究,并在三篇单独的文章中介绍了他们的发现。第1条讨论了两组学生(N = 207和N = 215)的考试成绩,他们在一节课中参加了两次类似的实践测试。第2条讨论了在第1天和第8天参加两次测验并在第12天进行了一次练习测验的新生(N = 221)的测试成绩。第3条探讨了报告其认知负荷的学生(N = 221)的测试方式并提供草稿纸。结果表明,总体而言,在线测试与纸质测试之间似乎没有什么区别。在计算机和书面模式之间,学生的考试成绩或认知负荷量度均未发现显着差异。但是,尽管使用的是刮擦纸,但两种模式之间的差异非常明显(eta2 = .04)。尽管学生在纸上进行化学测试时比在线使用更多的草稿纸,但尚不清楚大约一个问题的差异是否代表任何实际意义。本论文支持这样的结论,即在线考试是一种替代常规纸笔模式的有前途的替代方法,该模式是普通化学课程中最常用的,从纸张模式转换为在线模式不会给学生带来额外的认知负担。

著录项

  • 作者

    Prisacari, Anna Agripina.;

  • 作者单位

    Iowa State University.;

  • 授予单位 Iowa State University.;
  • 学科 Educational psychology.;Chemistry.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 196 p.
  • 总页数 196
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号