首页> 外文学位 >A Purposeful Understanding of Homework.
【24h】

A Purposeful Understanding of Homework.

机译:对作业的有目的的理解。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There has been a long standing debate over the purpose of homework; it has been a topic for educational reform, discussed in educational debates, and looked at as a means to improve student achievement (Foyle & Bailey, 1986; Gill & Schlossman, 2003; Xu, 2005; Fisher & Frey, 2008). Homework can cause frustration for students and parents, which can lead to tension within the home (Gill & Schlossman, 2003). The tension and frustration can be magnified when homework is not assigned at the independent level, when teachers do not consider differences in social classes, and when time is not taken into consideration.;The purpose of this study was to analyze homework within one school district in two different elementary schools. Second and fourth grade classrooms in a Title I and a Non-Title I school were selected. I used an embedded multiple-case study design (Yin, 2014) drawing upon the following data sources: classroom observations, collections of completed homework samples, and interviews with students, teachers, and parents. This study unpacks multiple stakeholders' perceptions and purposes of homework. In addition, effective homework characteristics were researched to help all stakeholders have a common understanding.;Findings that emerged from this study are grouped into several key thematic areas: family support and expectations are viewed differently amongst teachers within and across grade levels and title/non-title school; the perception of the purpose of homework is varied by role (student, teacher, and family); homework is not differentiated by teachers; and teachers do not provide support to families on how they can assist with homework. Based upon the research conducted from the literature review, several of these findings did not meet effective characteristics of homework. Homework should be differentiated for students (Tomlinson, 2010), designed for independent practice (Vatterott, 2010), an opportunity for student growth (Sallee & Rigler, 2008; Wiggins, 2013), an opportunity for feedback from the teacher (Brookhart, 2012; Hattie, 2012), and time sensitive (Sallee & Rigler, 2008).
机译:关于功课目的的争论由来已久。它一直是教育改革的主题,在教育辩论中进行了讨论,并被视为提高学生成绩的一种手段(Foyle&Bailey,1986; Gill&Schlossman,2003; Xu,2005; Fisher&Frey,2008)。家庭作业会给学生和父母带来挫败感,并可能导致家庭内部的紧张感(Gill&Schlossman,2003)。当未在独立级别上分配功课,教师未考虑社会阶层的差异以及未考虑时间时,这种紧张感和挫败感会被放大。本研究的目的是分析一个学区内的功课在两个不同的小学。选择了Title I和非Title I学校的二年级和四年级教室。我使用了嵌入式多案例研究设计(Yin,2014年),它借鉴了以下数据源:课堂观察,完整的家庭作业样本收集以及与学生,老师和父母的访谈。这项研究揭示了多个利益相关者对家庭作业的看法和目的。此外,还研究了有效的家庭作业特征,以帮助所有利益相关者达成共识。;本研究的发现被归纳为几个关键主题领域:家庭支持和期望在年级和跨年级和职称/非职称的教师中有不同的看法职称学校;对家庭作业目的的理解因角色(学生,老师和家庭)而异;家庭作业没有老师的区分;并且老师不向家庭提供有关如何协助家庭作业的支持。根据文献综述进行的研究,其中一些发现不符合家庭作业的有效特征。应针对学生区分家庭作业(Tomlinson,2010),针对独立练习设计(Vatterott,2010),为学生提供成长的机会(Sallee&Rigler,2008; Wiggins,2013),获得老师反馈的机会(Brookhart,2012)。 ; Hattie,2012年)和时间敏感(Sallee&Rigler,2008年)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Phares, Tim.;

  • 作者单位

    Ball State University.;

  • 授予单位 Ball State University.;
  • 学科 Elementary education.;Educational philosophy.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 141 p.
  • 总页数 141
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号