首页> 外文学位 >For Narrativity: How Creating Narratives Structures Experience and Self.
【24h】

For Narrativity: How Creating Narratives Structures Experience and Self.

机译:对于叙事:叙事结构如何创造体验和自我。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation responds to the challenge to narrativity posed by Galen Strawson in "Against Narrativity," where he claims that not everyone is Narrative by nature and that there is no reason to be. I make my claim "For Narrativity" as a mental process of form finding and coherence seeking over time that is an inherent mental activity and essential for experience of one's Self. I make my case through examinations of our experience of time, our use of language, how we plan, and our sense of Self. In the first chapter, I show that considering Narrativity as viewing life as a story -- focused on the product, rather than the process -- is a category mistake. I put forward a revised definition of Narrativity, as a process of Narrativizing, i.e., taking the temporal flow of experience and continually shaping and reshaping it towards something like a narrative, without necessarily ever achieving a completed form. The second chapter reflects on the value of narratives for our understanding and show the importance of Narrativizing: Only through Narrativizing are we able to project into the future. The third chapter responds to Strawson's proposal of an Episodic, non-Narrative person, taking counter-examples from some of the literary works he uses, including Proust and Musil. The fourth chapter explores Narrativity as essential to Self and the creation of Self as the organizing principle of experience. I respond to Derek Parfit, another opponent of narrativity, who argues that the Self is a falsehood. The fifth chapter draws a connection between how Narrativity functions in response to experience, and how a literary narrative triggers our mental process of Narrativity, allowing us to become engaged with the work, and proposes Narrativity as a tool to resolve the Paradox of Fiction.
机译:这篇论文回应了盖伦·斯特劳森(Galen Strawson)在“反对叙事”一书中对叙事提出的挑战,他声称并不是每个人本质上都是叙事,因此没有理由。我声称“为叙事”是一种随着时间的流逝寻求形式和寻求连贯性的心理过程,这是一种固有的心理活动,对于体验自己的自我至关重要。我通过检查我们的时间经验,语言使用,计划方式和自我意识来证明自己的观点。在第一章中,我表明将叙事性视为将生命视为一个故事(专注于产品而不是过程)是一个类别错误。我提出了一种对叙事性的修订定义,这是一种叙事过程,即利用经验的时间流向,不断地将其塑造和重塑为叙事之类的东西,而不必实现完整的形式。第二章反思叙事对我们理解的价值,并说明叙事的重要性:只有通过叙事,我们才能预测未来。第三章回应了斯特劳森关于情节性,非叙事性人物的提议,并从他所使用的一些文学作品中反例,包括普鲁斯特和穆西尔。第四章探讨了叙事是自我的本质,而自我的创造则是经验的组织原则。我对另一位叙事反对者德里克·帕菲特(Derek Parfit)做出回应,他认为“自我”是虚假的。第五章在叙述性如何响应经验而运作,以及文学叙事如何触发我们的叙述性心理过程之间建立联系,从而使我们能够参与到工作中,并提出叙述性作为解决小说悖论的工具。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stelmak Schabner, Natallia.;

  • 作者单位

    City University of New York.;

  • 授予单位 City University of New York.;
  • 学科 Aesthetics.;Slavic literature.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 134 p.
  • 总页数 134
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:47

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号