首页> 外文学位 >Assessing personality in the employment interview: The impact of rater training and individual differences on rating accuracy.
【24h】

Assessing personality in the employment interview: The impact of rater training and individual differences on rating accuracy.

机译:在就业面试中评估人格:评估者培训和个人差异对评估准确性的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Personality variables can be a useful addition to personnel selection systems. Although typically measured in this context using self-report measures, there is evidence that employment interviewers can make valid judgments of personality; however, not all interviewers are equally accurate. This dissertation examined the effectiveness of systematic training as a way of improving the accuracy of interviewers' personality ratings.;In Study 1, videotaped mock employment interviews were developed, and true score estimates of the targets' personality traits were developed. Study 2 involved the development of a training program designed to teach participants to make use of personality-related cues. Participants (N = 164) watched videotaped segments of 3 mock employment interviews, and judged the personality of those interviewees.;It was hypothesized that participants in the training group would make more accurate personality ratings than would participants in the control group. There was evidence that the training was effective. The trained group was more accurate than the control group for some, but not all, of the rated traits. It was also hypothesized that the training program would increase participants' knowledge of personality, as evidenced by higher scores on a test of dispositional intelligence. There was no support for this hypothesis, suggesting that dispositional intelligence was not the mechanism though which rating accuracy was improved.;This study also investigated the contribution of individual differences to rating accuracy. It was hypothesized that accurate personality judgments of others would be related to judges' general mental ability, interpersonal orientation, Extraversion, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. There was little support for the relations between individual differences of judges and rating accuracy. These findings are an important contribution in understanding the processes involved in rating accuracy.;According to Funder's (1995) Realistic Accuracy Model (RAM), individuals who are knowledgeable about the behavioral cues of personality traits should be skilled in making accurate judgments of others. According to RAM, such knowledge is obtained through the experience of making judgments and receiving feedback. The purpose of this research was to develop a training protocol to enhance raters' knowledge of personality and, in so doing, improve the accuracy of their personality judgments.;Keywords. personality, employment interview, individual differences; personality judgment; dispositional intelligence; frame of reference training.
机译:人格变量可能是人员选择系统的有用补充。尽管通常在这种情况下使用自我报告的方法进行测量,但有证据表明,职业访问员可以对人格做出有效的判断。然而,并非所有的面试官都同样准确。本文研究了系统培训作为提高访调员人格等级准确度的一种方法的有效性。在研究1中,开发了录像的模拟就业面试,并开发了目标人格特质的真实得分估计。研究2涉及开发一个培训计划,该计划旨在教会参与者使用与性格有关的线索。参与者(N = 164)观看了3个模拟就业访谈的录像片段,并判断了这些受访者的性格。假设,与对照组相比,培训组的参与者对人格的评估更为准确。有证据表明培训是有效的。对于某些但不是全部的额定特征,​​训练有素的组比对照组更准确。还假设培训计划将增加参与者对人格的知识,如性格智力测验得分较高所证明。这一假设没有得到支持,这表明处置性智力并不是提高评分准确性的机制。本研究还研究了个体差异对评分准确性的影响。据推测,他人的正确人格判断将与法官的整体智力,人际关系,外向性,和gree可亲和尽责有关。法官个人差异与评分准确性之间的关系几乎没有支持。这些发现对理解评分准确性过程具有重要意义。根据Funder(1995)的“现实准确性模型”(RAM),对人格特质的行为线索有一定了解的个人应该熟练地对他人做出正确的判断。根据RAM,这种知识是通过做出判断和接收反馈的经验获得的。这项研究的目的是开发一种培训协议,以增强评估者的人格知识,并以此提高他们的人格判断的准确性。性格,就业面试,个人差异;人格判断;性情智力;参考培训框架。

著录项

  • 作者

    Powell, Deborah M.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Western Ontario (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 The University of Western Ontario (Canada).;
  • 学科 Psychology Industrial.;Psychology Personality.;Education Business.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 160 p.
  • 总页数 160
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号