首页> 外文学位 >Mutual and hedge fund investment strategies: Trading based on post earnings announcement drift anomaly.
【24h】

Mutual and hedge fund investment strategies: Trading based on post earnings announcement drift anomaly.

机译:共同和对冲基金投资策略:基于盈余公告后的漂移异常进行交易。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this study, I explore whether hedge fund managers trade deliberately on Post Earnings Announcement Drift anomaly. Using a unique hand-collected dataset consisting of mandatory quarterly holding disclosure forms submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) by hedge fund managers, I compare hedge fund investment strategy with that of mutual funds. Following the methodology of Ali, Chen, Yao, and Yu (2008), I show that actively-managed U.S. Mutual and Hedge Funds, on average, trade on the Post Earnings Announcement Drift anomaly. The results also point out that hedge fund managers trade more aggressively on the drift anomaly. Trading on Post Earnings Announcement Drift anomaly persist for top 10% of active-trader funds. I also document that this trading is robust to the control of other fund investment strategies such as size, book-to-market, and momentum. Moreover, mutual funds that actively trade on drift anomaly face higher transaction costs. Similar results are shown for the hedge funds. Both mutual and hedge funds that more actively trade on drift anomaly have less diversified stockholdings and face higher volatility of stock returns in their stockholdings. These features of securities held in fund portfolios induce arbitrage risks and could have a diminishing effect on the fund managers' motivation to exploit drift anomaly more aggressively. Both mutual and hedge fund managers avoid transaction costs in their portfolio optimization decisions for profit concerns. On the other hand, the results provide an interesting discussion for Shleifer and Vishny (1997) arbitrage risk arguments. Because of different fund flow structures, there is a significant difference between mutual and hedge fund managers' arbitrage risk preferences in their portfolio optimization decisions. Volatile markets are attractive for arbitrage since high return volatility is associated with more frequent extreme prices, but since mutual fund managers are prone to fund outflows because of poor short-term performance, they tend to avoid investing in stocks with high return volatility. Hedge funds are protected against short-term fund outflows, and this enables them to be less concerned about arbitrage risk.
机译:在这项研究中,我探讨了对冲基金经理是否有意在盈余公告后的异常情况下进行交易。我使用由对冲基金经理提交给美国证券交易委员会(SEC)的强制性季度持有披露表格组成的独特的手工收集数据集,将对冲基金投资策略与共同基金进行了比较。遵循Ali,Chen,Yao和Yu(2008)的方法,我表明,平均而言,积极管理的美国共同基金和对冲基金在“收益后公告漂移”异常上进行交易。结果还指出,对冲基金经理在漂移异常方面的交易更为激进。在收益公布后的交易中,活跃交易者资金的前10%仍存在漂移异常。我还证明,这种交易对于控制其他基金投资策略(例如规模,账面市值和动量)具有鲁棒性。而且,在漂移异常上积极交易的共同基金面临更高的交易成本。对冲基金的结果相似。积极参与漂移异常交易的共同基金和对冲基金的股票持有量较少,并且其股票持有量面临更大的股票收益波动性。基金投资组合中持有的证券的这些特征会引发套利风险,并且可能对基金经理更积极地利用漂移异常的动机产生影响。共同基金和对冲基金经理都在其投资组合优化决策中避免了交易成本,以解决利润问题。另一方面,结果为Shleifer和Vishny(1997)的套利风险论证提供了有趣的讨论。由于资金流结构不同,共同基金和对冲基金经理在其投资组合优化决策中的套利风险偏好存在显着差异。波动性市场吸引套利,因为高回报波动性与更频繁的极端价格相关,但是由于共同基金经理由于短期表现不佳而倾向于资金流出,因此他们倾向于避免投资于高回报波动性的股票。保护对冲基金免受短期资金外流的影响,这使它们不必担心套利风险。

著录项

  • 作者

    Coskun, Ali.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Texas at Dallas.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Texas at Dallas.;
  • 学科 Accounting.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 116 p.
  • 总页数 116
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 康复医学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:30

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号