首页> 外文会议>2007 China International Conference in Finance >Riding the Post Earnings Announcement Drift: Evidence from Mutual Funds
【24h】

Riding the Post Earnings Announcement Drift: Evidence from Mutual Funds

机译:摆脱盈余公告的漂移:共同基金的证据

获取原文

摘要

This paper uses portfolio holdings and returns of mutual funds to study whether investors can profitably trade on the post earnings announcement drift (PEAD). We find that actively-managed US equity mutual funds on average trade on PEAD, even after controlling for different investment styles and momentum trading. Further, trading on PEAD is profitable: net of both transaction costs and fund expenses, the annual Carhart (1997) four-factor alpha of the top 10% of funds most actively following the PEAD strategy is 2.10% higher than that of a group of benchmark funds not actively using the strategy. However, across funds, more active trading on PEAD is associated with less portfolio diversification, higher volatility in fund returns and higher volatility in fund flows, representing adverse consequences of arbitrage risk. Finally, we document the temporal dynamics between fund trading and the profitability of the PEAD strategy: higher profitability attracts more intense trading by funds, which, in turn, leads to lower future profitability.
机译:本文使用投资组合的持有量和共同基金的收益来研究投资者是否可以在盈余公告后浮动价(PEAD)上进行获利交易。我们发现,即使在控制了不同的投资方式和动量交易之后,积极管理的美国股票共同基金也平均在PEAD上交易。此外,在PEAD上交易是有利可图的:扣除交易成本和基金费用后,最积极采用PEAD策略的前10%基金的年度Carhart(1997)四因素alpha值比一组PEAC交易者高2.10%。基准基金未积极使用该策略。但是,在各基金中,PEAD上更活跃的交易与更少的投资组合分散,更高的基金收益波动率和更高的资金流量波动率相关联,这代表了套利风险的不利后果。最后,我们记录了基金交易与PEAD策略的获利能力之间的时间动态:更高的获利能力吸引了资金的更激烈交易,进而导致未来获利能力降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号