首页> 外文学位 >Patterns of persuasion: Religious literary dialogue in Renaissance France.
【24h】

Patterns of persuasion: Religious literary dialogue in Renaissance France.

机译:说服方式:法国文艺复兴时期的宗教文学对话。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Considered the quintessential philosophical genre since Ancient Greece, the dialogue experienced a resurgence during the Renaissance and was used to treat topics ranging from music and dance to politics and religion. This dissertation challenges prevailing scholarly explanations for the popularity of the dialogue, which often attribute its widespread use to the influence of humanistic traditions and an increasing openness to the "Other." These reasons fail to encompass "high stakes" dialogues on particularly controversial issues. Through a textual and rhetorical analysis of four dialogues from the French Wars of Religion, this dissertation examines the decision to present in dialogic form the doctrinal disputes between Catholics and Protestants. These dialogues---all by little-known authors and neglected by modern scholars---have been chosen for their primarily doctrinal content and for their representation of a conversation between a Protestant and a Catholic. Other than this common decision to give the religious opponent a voice, the dialogues present divergent persuasive strategies, particularly by situating the reader at different distances from the conversation. Chapters 1 and 3 treat dialogues written by Catholics: the Discours Familier (1566) by Pierre Regis and Discours Veritable (1604), attributed to Joachim Le Miere (Le Myere). Chapters 2 and 4 study Protestant dialogues: Le Pacifique (1590) by Theophile Friderick (pseudonym) and the Dialogues Rustiques (1608) by Jean de Moncy. This dissertation considers each work in chronological order, which coincides with a movement from a scholarly use of the dialogue towards a theatrical model. While demonstrating the range of possibility within the dialogic genre, the dialogues have in common the importance accorded to the rhetorical principles of ethos and pathos, relative to logos.
机译:对话自古希腊以来就被视为最典型的哲学体裁,在文艺复兴时期经历了复兴,并被用来处理从音乐,舞蹈到政治和宗教的话题。这篇论文挑战了对话流行的学术解释,对话的流行经常将对话的广泛使用归因于人文传统的影响以及对“其他”的日益开放。这些原因未能涵盖关于特别有争议的问题的“高风险”对话。通过对法国宗教战争中四次对话的文字和修辞分析,本文探讨了以对话形式提出天主教徒和新教徒之间的教义纠纷的决定。之所以选择这些对话(都是鲜为人知的作者,而被现代学者所忽视),是因为它们的主要教义内容以及代表新教徒和天主教徒之间的对话而被选中。除了让宗教对手发声的共同决定外,对话还提出了不同的说服性策略,特别是通过将读者置于距对话不同距离的位置。第1章和第3章讨论了天主教徒的对话:皮埃尔·里吉斯(Pierre Regis)的“ Discours Familier(1566)”和归因于Joachim Le Miere(Le Myere)的Discours Veritable(1604)。第2章和第4章研究新教徒的对话:Theophile Friderick(化名)的Le Pacifique(1590)和Jean de Moncy的Dialogues Rustiques(1608)。本文按时间顺序考虑了每部作品,这与从学术界使用对话到戏剧模型的趋势相吻合。在说明对话类型中可能性的范围时,对话具有共同的重要性,即相对于徽标,精神和情感的修辞原则给予了重视。

著录项

  • 作者

    Weidenbaum, Shira Chaya.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Literature Romance.;Religion History of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 165 p.
  • 总页数 165
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号