首页> 外文学位 >Productive whole-class discussions: A qualitative analysis of peer leader behaviors in general chemistry.
【24h】

Productive whole-class discussions: A qualitative analysis of peer leader behaviors in general chemistry.

机译:富有成效的全班讨论:对通用化学中同伴领导者行为的定性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The intention of this research was to describe behaviors and characteristics of General Chemistry I peer leaders using a pedagogical reform method referred to as Peer-led Guided Inquiry (PLGI), and to discuss the ways in which these peer leaders created productive whole-class discussions. This reform technique engaged students to work on guided inquiry activities while working cooperatively in small groups, led by undergraduate peer leaders. These sessions were video recorded and transcribed. The data was evaluated using grounded theory methods of analysis. This study examined the dialog between students and peer leaders, paying specific attention to question types and observed patterns of interactions. The research took shape by examining the kinds of questions asked by peer leaders and the purposes these questions served. In addition to looking at questions, different kinds of behaviors displayed by peer leaders during their small group sessions were also observed. A close examination of peer leader questions and behaviors aided in developing an answer to the overall research question regarding what factors are associated with productive whole-class discussions.;Five major categories of peer leader behaviors evolved from the data and provided a means to compare and contrast productive whole-class discussions. While no category single-handedly determined if a discussion was good or bad, there was a tendency for peer leaders who exhibited positive traits in at least three of the following categories to have consistently better whole-class discussions: Procedural Practices, Supervisory Qualities, Questioning Techniques, Feedback/Responses, and Interpersonal Skills. Furthermore, each of the major categories is tied directly to Interpersonal, Communication, and Leadership skills and their interactions with each other. This study also addressed applications that each of these categories has on instructional practices and their need in peer leader training. In addition, a scale was developed for rating the relative effectiveness of whole-class discussions in terms of student participation. This study provides a tool for measuring productive whole-class discussions, as well as practical applications for peer leader (or teacher) training.
机译:这项研究的目的是使用一种称为Peer-led Guideed Inquiry(PLGI)的教学改革方法描述通用化学I同行领导者的行为和特征,并讨论这些同行领导者进行富有成效的全班讨论的方式。这种改革技术使学生在本科生领导者的带领下以小组的形式合作开展指导性探究活动。这些会议都进行了录像和转录。使用扎根的理论分析方法对数据进行评估。这项研究检查了学生与同伴领袖之间的对话,特别关注问题类型和观察到的互动模式。通过研究同行领导者提出的各种问题以及这些问题的目的,研究得以形成。除了观察问题之外,还观察到了同行领导者在小组会议中表现出的各种行为。对同事领导者问题和行为的仔细检查有助于对有关哪些因素与富有成效的全班讨论相关的整体研究问题做出解答。同行领导行为的五个主要类别从数据中演变而来,并提供了比较和对比富有成效的全班讨论。虽然没有一个类别可以一手确定讨论的好坏,但至少在以下三个类别中表现出积极特质的同伴领导者倾向于始终如一地更好地进行全班讨论:程序性实践,监督素质,提问技术,反馈/回应和人际交往能力。此外,每个主要类别都直接与人际交往,沟通和领导技能以及他们之间的互动联系在一起。这项研究还针对这些类别中的每一个在教学实践中的应用以及他们在同伴领导者培训中的需求。此外,还开发了一个量表,用于根据学生的参与程度来评估全班讨论的相对有效性。这项研究为衡量富有成效的全班讨论提供了一种工具,并为同行领导(或教师)培训提供了实际应用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Eckart, Teresa McClain.;

  • 作者单位

    University of South Florida.;

  • 授予单位 University of South Florida.;
  • 学科 Science education.;Educational psychology.;Pedagogy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 342 p.
  • 总页数 342
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号