首页> 外文学位 >Examining two Turkish teachers' questioning patterns in secondary school science classrooms.
【24h】

Examining two Turkish teachers' questioning patterns in secondary school science classrooms.

机译:在中学科学教室中检查两名土耳其教师的提问方式。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examined low and high level teachers' questioning patterns and classroom implementations within an argument-based inquiry approach known as the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach, which addresses issues on negotiation, argumentation, learning, and teaching. The level of the teachers was determined by the students' writing scores. This study was conducted in Turkey with seven teacher for preliminary study. Because scoring writing samples examines the students' negotiation level with the different sources and students learn scientific process, as negotiation, which they may transfer into their writing, in classroom, two teachers were selected to represent low and high level teachers. Data collection involved classroom observation through video recordings. The comparative qualitative method was employed throughout the data analysis process with including quantitative results. The research questions that guided the present study were: (1) How are low and high level teachers, determined according to their students' writing scores, questioning patterns different from each other during classroom discourse? (2) Is there a relationship between students' writings and teachers' questioning styles in the classroom? Analysis of Qualitative data showed that teachers' classroom implementations reveal big differences based on argumentation patterns. The high level teacher, whose students had high scores in writing samples, asked more questions and the cognitive levels of questions were higher than the low level teacher. Questions promote an argumentative environment and improve critical thinking skills by discussing different ideas and claims. Asking more questions of teacher influences students to initiate (ask questions) more and to learn the scientific process with science concepts. Implicitly, this learning may improve students' comparison in their writing. Moreover, high level teacher had a more structured and organized classroom than low level teacher.
机译:这项研究在以论据为基础的探究方法(即科学写作启发法(SWH))中研究了低级和高级教师的提问模式和课堂实施情况,该方法解决了谈判,论证,学习和教学方面的问题。老师的水平取决于学生的写作成绩。这项研究在土耳其进行,有7位老师进行了初步研究。由于评分写作样本通过不同的来源检查学生的谈判水平,并且学生学习科学的过程,因为谈判是他们可以转化为写作的过程,因此在课堂上,我们选择了两名教师来代表低和高水平的老师。数据收集涉及通过录像观察教室。在整个数据分析过程中都采用了比较定性方法,包括定量结果。指导本研究的研究问题是:(1)在课堂讲授中,根据学生的写作成绩确定高,低位教师的提问方式是如何不同的? (2)课堂上学生的写作与老师的提问方式是否有关系?定性数据的分析表明,教师的课堂实施方式基于论证模式显示出很大的差异。高水平老师的学生在写作样本中得分较高,提出了更多的问题,并且问题的认知水平高于低水平老师。通过讨论不同的想法和主张,问题可以促进辩论的环境并提高批判性思维能力。问更多的老师问题会影响学生更多地发起(提问)并学习具有科学概念的科学过程。暗示地,这种学习可以改善学生的写作比较。而且,高水平的老师比低水平的老师拥有更加结构化和组织化的教室。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cikmaz, Ali.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Iowa.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Iowa.;
  • 学科 Science education.;Communication.;Educational evaluation.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 94 p.
  • 总页数 94
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号