首页> 外文学位 >Predictive validity of the individual growth and development indicators: Examination of students who attend head start.
【24h】

Predictive validity of the individual growth and development indicators: Examination of students who attend head start.

机译:个体成长和发展指标的预测有效性:参加初学者的学生的考试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of the current study was to explore the predictive nature of emergent literacy skills assessed utilizing the Individual Growth and Development Indicators (IGDIs; Early Childhood Research Institute on Measuring Growth and Development, 2000) prior to kindergarten entry on subsequent early literacy skills obtained through administration of Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS,6th Edition; Good & Kaminski, 2002) during kindergarten. The study was conducted with a group of 94 students who attended Head Start, some of whom were considered Dual Language Learners, having a Primary Language Status (PLS) other than English. Potential predictive bias of the IGDIs on the DIBELS based on parent-reported primary language status (i.e., Primary Language English or Primary Language as Other) as well as performance on specific literacy variables based on language status were also assessed. Overall results indicated that IGDIs were less predictive of kindergarten DIBELS measures than previously demonstrated in extant literature. In addition, differences on literacy variables based on PLS were only found on one preschool measure and were not found on any kindergarten measure. Finally, no evidence for predictive bias was found based on PLS. This investigation reinforces the need for further attention and development in the area of literacy assessment for specific groups of young children.
机译:本研究的目的是探讨在进入幼儿园之前,通过个人成长和发展指标(IGDI;幼儿成长和发展测量研究所,2000)评估的新兴识字技能的预测性质,以通过以下方式获得后续识字技能。在幼儿园期间管理基本早期识字技能动态指标(DIBELS,第6版; Good&Kaminski,2002)。这项研究是针对94名参加Head Start的学生进行的,其中有些人被认为是双语学习者,除了英语以外,他们的主要语言状态(PLS)。还评估了基于父母报告的主要语言状态(即主要语言英语或主要语言为其他语言)的IGDI对DIBELS的潜在预测偏差以及基于语言状态的特定读写变量的表现。总体结果表明,IGDI对幼儿园DIBELS措施的预测性不如现有文献中所证明的那样。此外,基于PLS的识字变量差异仅在一项学前教育措施中发现,而在任何幼儿园措施中均未发现。最后,没有发现基于PLS的预测偏差证据。这项调查强调了在特定年龄段儿童扫盲评估领域需要进一步关注和发展。

著录项

  • 作者

    Leichman, Erin S.;

  • 作者单位

    Lehigh University.;

  • 授予单位 Lehigh University.;
  • 学科 Psychology General.;Psychology Personality.;Psychology Developmental.;Education Educational Psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 158 p.
  • 总页数 158
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号