首页> 外文学位 >Expanding Access to Gifted Education Programs for Underrepresented Students: An Examination of Teacher Referral Decision-making
【24h】

Expanding Access to Gifted Education Programs for Underrepresented Students: An Examination of Teacher Referral Decision-making

机译:代表性不足的学生扩大获得资优教育计划的机会:教师推荐决策的考察

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Despite recent focus and concern regarding disproportionality in gifted education, minority students (Ford, 2014; McBee, 2006), as well as students with disabilities (Bianco, 2005; Bianco & Leech, 2010; Bratter, 2009), continue to be underrepresented within gifted programs. Previous research indicates that teacher characteristics significantly affect referral rates to gifted education programs, with special education teachers being less likely to refer students compared to general education teachers (Bianco, 2005), and gifted education teachers more likely to refer to gifted programs compared to special education and general education teachers (Bianco & Leech, 2010). Additionally, students with disabilities, are less likely to be referred (Bianco, 2005; Bianco & Leech, 2010). Furthermore, male students are shown to be more likely to be referred (Bianco, Harris, Garrison-Wade, & Leech, 2011).;The present study consists of a sample of 688 teachers, including 375 general education teachers, 119 gifted education teachers, and 194 special education teachers. While results are consistent with prior research, some important differences emerge when previously studied variables are allowed to interact more fully. Specifically, congruent to previous research, gifted education teachers are observed to be more likely to refer students for gifted education programming. Furthermore, unique to the current study, gifted education teachers also perceive students as being more intelligent compared to teachers of other types. Student gender, disability status (emotional disability), or ethnicity are not observed to be significant predictors of teacher referral decisions. Finally, teacher perception of their own level of competency related to identifying gifted children, and their education level related to gifted education are included in analyses.;Analysis related to these variables indicate that self-reported teacher competency is significantly related to both referral rates and teacher perceptions of student intelligence. Moreover, when perceived teacher competency is introduced to the model examining teacher referral rates, teacher type becomes non-significant, indicating that higher perceived teacher competency may significantly increase teacher willingness to refer to gifted programming. Furthermore, when perceived competency is introduced to the model examining teacher perceptions of intelligence, gifted education teachers continue to rate student intelligence significantly higher when compared to special education and general education teachers, but teachers of all types who indicate that they are competent in identifying gifted children also rate student intelligence higher. That is, when teachers feel competent, confident, and perceive themselves as having the background knowledge they need to make decisions, they are more likely to consider that a student may have advanced academic potential or aptitude. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
机译:尽管最近对资优教育的不均衡性给予了关注和关注,但少数族裔学生(福特,2014年;麦比,2006年)以及残疾学生(比安科,2005年;比安科和里奇,2010年;布拉特,2009年)在该领域的代表性仍然不足优才节目。先前的研究表明,教师特征显着影响资优教育课程的推荐率,与通识教育教师相比,特殊教育教师推荐学生的可能性较小(Bianco,2005),与特殊教育相比,资优教育教师更可能参考资优课程教育和通识教育老师(Bianco&Leech,2010)。此外,残疾学生被转介的可能性较小(Bianco,2005; Bianco&Leech,2010)。此外,事实证明,男生被推荐的可能性更高(Bianco,Harris,Garrison-Wade和Leech,2011年)。本研究包括688名教师,其中包括375名普通教育教师,119名资优教育教师。 ,以及194名特殊教育老师。虽然结果与先前的研究一致,但是当允许先前研究的变量进行更充分的交互时,会出现一些重要的差异。具体而言,与之前的研究一致,发现资优教育教师更有可能推荐学生参加资优教育计划。此外,对于当前的研究而言,资优教育老师还认为学生比其他类型的老师更聪明。学生的性别,残疾状况(情绪残疾)或种族不是教师推荐决定的重要预测因素。最后,教师对自己与识别资优儿童有关的能力水平的认知以及与资优教育有关的教育水平也包括在分析中;与这些变量有关的分析表明,自我报告的教师能力与推荐率和老师对学生智力的看法。此外,当将感知的教师能力引入检查教师推荐率的模型时,教师类型变得不重要,这表明较高的感知教师能力可能会显着提高教师参考资优课程的意愿。此外,当将知觉能力引入检查教师对智力的感知的模型时,与特殊教育和通识教育教师相比,资优教育教师继续对学生的智力进行评估,但是各种类型的教师表明他们有能力识别资优学生孩子们对学生的智力评价也更高。就是说,当教师感到有能力,有信心并认为自己具有做出决策所需的背景知识时,他们更有可能认为学生可能具有较高的学术潜力或能力。讨论了未来研究的局限性和方向。

著录项

  • 作者

    Smith, Veronica A.;

  • 作者单位

    Ball State University.;

  • 授予单位 Ball State University.;
  • 学科 Gifted education.;Educational psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 182 p.
  • 总页数 182
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号