首页> 外文学位 >Strategic bidding for price-maker hydroelectric producers.
【24h】

Strategic bidding for price-maker hydroelectric producers.

机译:为价格制定者的水力发电企业进行战略性招标。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Hydropower is arguably the most important and widely used renewable energy source in the world. Deregulation has led to the use of auction-based markets while a growing desire for efficient and renewable energy sources has rekindled modeling efforts in the energy sector. Producers that can impact prices with their production quantities are termed price makers, whereas producers that have no influence on prices are termed price takers. We ask: What is the revenue-maximizing production schedule for both single and multiple price-maker hydroelectric producers in a deregulated, bid-based market?;We begin by reviewing the problem in which producers submit bids to the day-ahead market, the bidding problem. Following the review, we model the problem over multiple stages for (i) a single price maker assuming deterministic inflows, (ii) a single price maker assuming stochastic inflows, and, finally, (iii) multiple price makers assuming deterministic inflows. Decomposition algorithms, like Benders decomposition and stochastic dual dynamic programming, are commonly used to solve multi-stage problems like ours. In all the above cases, our methodology aims to extend the stochastic dual dynamic programming algorithm.;The market interaction between producers creates a revenue function with jump discontinuities. Because of the discontinuities, we use mixed-integer linear programming to model the revenue, thus precluding us from solving the problem with either of the aforementioned algorithms. To overcome this difficulty, we pair Lagrangian relaxation with either Benders decomposition or stochastic dual dynamic programming, in the deterministic and stochastic cases. In addition to often yielding better bounds and solutions, we prove our method never yields worse bounds. For multiple price-maker producers, we consider each price maker's bidding decision in a non-cooperative Nash-Cournot game, in which we seek a Nash equilibrium for all of the price-maker producers' bids in every stage. Unlike current approaches, when one exists, our method returns an equilibrium that is preferred by all price makers.
机译:水电可以说是世界上最重要和使用最广泛的可再生能源。放松管制导致使用基于拍卖的市场,而对高效和可再生能源的日益增长的需求重新点燃了能源部门的建模工作。可能影响其产量的价格的生产者称为价格制造者,而对价格没有影响的生产者称为价格接受者。我们问:在放松管制的基于投标的市场中,单一价格制造商和多个价格制定者的水力发电企业的收益最大化的生产时间表是什么?;我们首先回顾了生产者向日前市场提交投标的问题,即竞标问题。审查之后,我们对多个问题进行了建模:(i)假定价格流入确定性的单个价格制定者,(ii)假定随机流入确定性的单个价格制定者,最后(iii)假定确定性流入的多个价格制定者。分解算法(例如Benders分解和随机双重动态规划)通常用于解决像我们这样的多阶段问题。在上述所有情况下,我们的方法旨在扩展随机双重动态规划算法。生产者之间的市场互动产生了具有跳跃间断的收益函数。由于不连续,我们使用混合整数线性规划对收益进行建模,从而使我们无法使用上述任何一种算法来解决问题。为了克服这个困难,在确定性和随机情况下,我们将Lagrangian松弛与Benders分解或随机双重动态规划配对。除了经常产生更好的边界和解之外,我们证明了我们的方法永远不会产生更差的边界。对于多个价格制定者,我们在非合作的Nash-Cournot博弈中考虑每个价格制定者的竞标决策,在该博弈中,我们寻求每个阶段的所有价格制定者出价的Nash均衡。与当前的方法不同,当存在一种方法时,我们的方法将返回所有价格制定者都喜欢的均衡。

著录项

  • 作者

    Steeger, Gregory M.;

  • 作者单位

    Colorado School of Mines.;

  • 授予单位 Colorado School of Mines.;
  • 学科 Operations Research.;Alternative Energy.;Economics Environmental.;Economics Theory.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 214 p.
  • 总页数 214
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号