首页> 外文学位 >Effects of Enzymatically Hydrolyzed Yeast Supplementation and Supplementation Frequency on Immune Parameters, Performance, and Digestibility among Periparturient Beef Cows and Calves
【24h】

Effects of Enzymatically Hydrolyzed Yeast Supplementation and Supplementation Frequency on Immune Parameters, Performance, and Digestibility among Periparturient Beef Cows and Calves

机译:酶水解酵母的添加和添加频率对围产期肉牛和犊牛免疫参数,生产性能和消化率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Effects of enzymatically hydrolyzed yeast (EHY) and supplementation frequency (FREQ) on immune parameters among beef cows and calves was evaluated. Eighty multiparous (parity = 4.2 +/- 0.3) cows were fed a common brome hay-based diet (CP = 8.0 ? 0.17%). Cows were blocked by expected calving date and stratified by body condition score (BCS) before random assignment of treatment. Beginning 88 +/- 5 d prior to parturition, cows were provided 1 kg daily or 3 kg every 3 d of a soybean hull-based supplement (CP = 34.0, % of DM) that contained 0 or 3 g/kg EHY. The daily supplement was designed to meet ruminal N requirements (total or DIP?). Cows were vaccinated against rotavirus at 62 and 48 +/- 5d prior to parturition. Sera and plasma samples were collected at 62, 48, 40, 24 and 14 d prior to parturition. At parturition, colostrum was collected via portable milking unit from cows prior to feeding to calves and plasma and sera was collected from cows and calves. Subsequently, calf plasma was collected at 2 and 14 d after parturition. Calf plasma Immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration increased (quadratic < 0.01) as age increased and passive transfer status among calves was 'excellent' (i.e. plasma IgG concentration was greater than 15 g/L among calves aged 2 d; APHIS, 2010). Plasma IgG was greater (P = 0.03) among calves born to cows receiving EHY and FREQ had no effect on plasma IgG in calves. Despite differences among calf plasma IgG concentrations, there was no significant effect of EHY or FREQ on colostrum yield, colostral IgG or calf intake of colostrum. Similarly, apparent efficiency of IgG absorption (AEA) and sera rotavirus neutralization titers (RNT) among calves aged 14 d was not affected by treatment (P ≥ 0.36). Cow plasma IgG decreased (quadratic = 0.02) as cows neared parturition and were not affected by EHY (P = 0.56) or FREQ ( P = 0.14). We observed a quadratic increase in rotavirus neutralization titers in cow sera in response to vaccination, as expected. Sera rotavirus neutralization titers were not impacted by EHY (P = 0.70) nor FREQ (P = 0.42).;Effects of enzymatically hydrolyzed yeast (EHY) and supplementation frequency on cow BW, cow BCS, calf BW, and cow milk production was evaluated. The same 80 multiparous (parity = 4.2 +/- 0.3) cows were fed a common brome hay-based diet (CP = 8.0 +/- 0.17%). Cows were blocked by expected calving date and stratified by BCS before random assignment of treatment. Beginning 88 +/- 5 d prior to parturition, cows were provided 1 kg daily or 3 kg every 3 d of a soybean hull-based supplement (CP = 34% of DM) that contained 0 or 3 g/kg EHY. The daily supplement was designed to meet ruminal N requirements (total or DIP?). Cows were weighed on 88, 62, 48, 40, 24, 14 and 0 d prior to parturition. Although cow BW was recorded, it was not analyzed (Why?). Three trained technicians recorded BCS on the same day. After calving, milk production was recorded on 30, 90, and 150 d. Samples of milk from each cow were sent to Dairy Herd Improvement Agency (DHIA) for analysis. Cow BCS increased (linear < 0.01) as cows neared parturition. Frequency of supplementation tended (P < 0.06) to increase BCS, whereas, effect of supplementation with EHY (P < 0.91) on cow BCS was not significant. Total cow milk yield (kg/d) decreased ( quadratic < 0.01) by day. Neither FREQ (P = 0.23) nor EHY (P = 0.59) significantly affected total milk yield. Milk fat yield, milk protein yield, and energy corrected milk (ECM) yield was calculated. Milk fat yield decreased (quadratic < 0.01) by day. Neither FREQ (P = 0.34) nor EHY (P = 0.63) effected milk fat yield. Energy corrected milk yield decreased (quadratic < 0.01) by day and neither FREQ (P = 0.25) or EHY (P = 0.78) affected ECM. Milk protein yield was not affected by FREQ (P = 0.13) or EHY ( P = 0.69) but was affected by d (quadratic < 0.01).
机译:评估了酶水解酵母(EHY)和添加频率(FREQ)对肉牛和犊牛免疫参数的影响。给80头多胎(胎次= 4.2 +/- 0.3)的牛喂食以bro鱼干草为基础的普通日粮(CP = 8.0〜0.17%)。在随机分配治疗之前,将母牛限制在预期产犊日期并根据身体状况评分(BCS)进行分层。在分娩前88 +/- 5 d开始,每天向母牛提供1千克或每3 d每3 d的大豆皮补充饲料(CP = 34.0,DM的百分比),其中包含0或3 g / kg EHY。每日补充剂旨在满足瘤胃中的氮含量要求(总计或DIP?)。在分娩之前,在第62和48 +/- 5天对母牛接种轮状病毒疫苗。在分娩前62、48、40、24和14 d收集血清和血浆样品。在分娩时,在喂给犊牛和血浆之前,通过便携式挤奶装置从牛身上收集初乳,并从牛和犊牛上收集血清。随后,在分娩后2和14天收集小牛血浆。随着年龄的增长,犊牛血浆中免疫球蛋白G(IgG)的浓度增加(二次方<0.01),并且犊牛之间的被动转移状态为``极好''(即2 d龄犊牛中血浆IgG浓度大于15 g / L; APHIS,2010)。在接受EHY和FREQ的母牛出生的犊牛中,血浆IgG更高(P = 0.03)对犊牛的血浆IgG没有影响。尽管小腿血浆IgG浓度之间存在差异,但EHY或FREQ对初乳产量,初乳IgG或小牛初乳摄入量没有明显影响。同样,年龄在14 d的犊牛中IgG吸收(AEA)和轮状病毒中和效价(RNT)的表观效率不受治疗的影响(P≥0.36)。随着母牛接近分娩,并且不受EHY(P = 0.56)或FREQ(P = 0.14)影响,母牛血浆IgG降低(二次= 0.02)。正如预期的那样,我们观察到牛血清中轮状病毒中和效价在接种疫苗后呈二次方增加。血清轮状病毒中和滴度不受EHY(P = 0.70)或FREQ(P = 0.42)的影响;评估了酶水解酵母(EHY)和添加频率对牛BW,牛BCS,小牛BW和牛奶产量的影响。相同的80头多胎(胎次= 4.2 +/- 0.3)的母牛饲喂普通的以干草为基础的干草饲料(CP = 8.0 +/- 0.17%)。在随机分配治疗之前,将母牛限制在预期的产犊日期并通过BCS对其进行分层。在分娩前88 +/- 5 d开始,每天向母牛提供1千克或每3 d 3千克的大豆皮补充饲料(CP = DM的34%),其中包含0或3 g / kg EHY。每日补充剂旨在满足瘤胃中的氮含量要求(总计或DIP?)。在分娩前,母牛分别在88、62、48、40、24、14和0 d称重。尽管记录了母牛的体重,但没有对其进行分析(为什么?)。三名训练有素的技术人员在同一天记录了BCS。产犊后,在30、90和150天记录产奶量。将每头母牛的牛奶样本发送到奶牛改良局(DHIA)进行分析。随着牛接近分娩,牛BCS增加(线性<0.01)。补充频率趋于(P <0.06)增加BCS,而EHY补充(P <0.91)对奶牛BCS的影响并不显着。每天的总牛奶产量(kg / d)下降(二次方<0.01)。 FREQ(P = 0.23)和EHY(P = 0.59)均未显着影响总产奶量。计算了乳脂产量,乳蛋白产量和能量校正乳(ECM)产量。牛奶脂肪产量每天下降(二次<0.01)。 FREQ(P = 0.34)和EHY(P = 0.63)都不影响乳脂产量。能量校正的牛奶产量每天下降(二次<0.01),FREQ(P = 0.25)或EHY(P = 0.78)均不影响ECM。牛奶蛋白产量不受FREQ(P = 0.13)或EHY(P = 0.69)的影响,但受d(二次方<0.01)的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sinniger, Janine.;

  • 作者单位

    South Dakota State University.;

  • 授予单位 South Dakota State University.;
  • 学科 Animal sciences.;Nutrition.;Animal diseases.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 63 p.
  • 总页数 63
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号