首页> 外文学位 >Universal Design for Learning as a framework for social justice: A multi-case analysis of undergraduate pre-service teachers.
【24h】

Universal Design for Learning as a framework for social justice: A multi-case analysis of undergraduate pre-service teachers.

机译:通用学习设计作为社会正义的框架:本科生职前教师的多案例分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The diversity of the student population in K--12 settings has steadily increased over the past few decades. While students who are of a racial/ethnic minority background have increased (Villegas & Lucas, 2007), teachers are increasingly young, female, and white (Goldenberg, 2008; NCES, 2013). In acknowledging these demographic discrepancies between teachers and students, many studies and reports have put forward an array of frameworks that teachers can employ in their practice to address diversity. Among these frameworks are Teaching for Social Justice (TSJ) and Universal Design for Learning (UDL). This dissertation seeks to examine the potential relationship among the two frameworks as viewed by undergraduate teacher candidates as they develop their dispositions for teaching diverse learners through a 17-week course attached to a one-day-per-week pre-practicum experience.;This multi-case study examined how the beliefs of 19 participants regarding TSJ and UDL changed over the course of a 6-month study within the context of a course. This study investigated how these participants connected UDL and social justice as a cohesive framework for addressing diversity in the classroom. Using daily and weekly journals, online discussion forums, and pre- and post- surveys, this study analyzed all 19 participants to identify four representative cases.;Findings from this study reveal that most participants were impacted by the course to the extent that they were able to identify the importance of aspects of social justice in the practice of an educator. Fewer participants were able to identify the role of UDL in the classroom. Only one participant viewed social justice and UDL as a cohesive framework for impacting classroom practice. Analysis of the representative case studies suggests that participants at this level of development may need more time to engage in complicated abstract concepts. They may also need course-attached field placements in classrooms that align with the mission and vision of the preparation program, consistency in messaging through the duration of a preparation program, and differentiated supports based on their background experiences.
机译:在过去的几十年中,K--12环境中的学生人数稳定增长。虽然具有种族/族裔背景的学生有所增加(Villegas&Lucas,2007),但教师的年龄却越来越年轻,女性和白人(Goldenberg,2008; NCES,2013)。在认识到教师和学生之间的人口统计学差异时,许多研究和报告提出了一系列框架,教师可以在实践中采用这些框架来解决多样性。这些框架包括社会正义教学(TSJ)和通用学习设计(UDL)。本文旨在研究本科生应聘者在为期17周的课程并附有一周的一天的实习前经验而发展为不同的学习者教学的能力时,所考察的两个框架之间的潜在关系。一项多案例研究研究了在为期6个月的研究过程中,根据课程情况,19名参与者对TSJ和UDL的信念如何发生变化。这项研究调查了这些参与者如何将UDL和社会正义联系起来,作为解决教室多样性的凝聚框架。这项研究使用每日和每周的期刊,在线讨论论坛以及调查前和调查后,对所有19名参与者进行了分析,以找出4个代表性案例。该研究的结果表明,大多数参与者受到该过程的影响程度达到能够确定社会公正方面在教育工作者的实践中的重要性。较少的参与者能够确定UDL在教室中的作用。只有一位参与者将社会正义和UDL视为影响课堂实践的凝聚框架。对代表性案例研究的分析表明,处于这一发展水平的参与者可能需要更多时间来参与复杂的抽象概念。他们可能还需要在教室中与课程相关的现场布置,这些布置应与准备计划的使命和愿景保持一致,在准备计划进行过程中保持消息传递的一致性,并根据其背景经验提供不同的支持。

著录项

  • 作者

    Venkatesh, Kavita.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston College.;

  • 授予单位 Boston College.;
  • 学科 Teacher education.;Multicultural Education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 215 p.
  • 总页数 215
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号