首页> 外文学位 >Effect of Personalized Learning Paths on Learning Quadratics in Algebra.
【24h】

Effect of Personalized Learning Paths on Learning Quadratics in Algebra.

机译:个性化学习路径对代数学习二次方的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study was conducted to assess the performance of 176 students who received algebra instruction through an online platform presented in one of two experimental conditions to explore the effect of personalized learning paths by comparing it with linearly flowing instruction. The study was designed around eight research questions investigating the effect of personalized learning paths on students' learning, intrinsic motivation and satisfaction with their experience. Quantitative results were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) and split-plot ANOVA methods. Additionally, qualitative feedback data were gathered from students and teachers on their experience to better explain the quantitative findings as well as improve understanding of how to effectively design an adaptive personalized learning platform. Quantitative results of the study showed no statistical difference between students assigned to treatments that compared linear and adaptive personalized instructional flows.;The lack of significant differences was explained by two main factors: (a) low usage and (b) platform and content related issues. Low usage may have prevented students from being exposed to the platforms long enough to create a potential for differences between the groups. Additionally, the reasons for low usage may in part be explained by the qualitative findings, which indicated that unmotivated and tired teachers and students were not very enthusiastic about the study because it occurred near the end of school year. Further, computer access was a challenging issue at the school throughout the study. On the other hand, platform and content related issues worked to inhibit the potential beneficial effects of the platforms. The three prominent issues were: (a) the majority of the students found the content boring or difficult, (b) repeated recommendations from the adaptive platform created frustration, and (c) a barely moving progress bar caused disappointment among participants.
机译:这项研究的目的是通过在两个实验条件之一中介绍的在线平台上评估接受代数教学的176名学生的表现,通过将其与线性流动教学进行比较来探索个性化学习路径的效果。该研究是围绕八个研究问题设计的,旨在研究个性化学习路径对学生学习,内在动力和对他们的体验的满意度的影响。使用方差分析(ANOVA),协方差分析(ANCOVA)和分割图ANOVA方法分析定量结果。此外,还从学生和教师的经验中收集了定性反馈数据,以更好地解释定量结果,并加深了对如何有效设计自适应个性化学习平台的理解。该研究的定量结果显示,分配给进行线性和自适应个性化教学流比较的治疗的学生之间没有统计学差异。;缺乏显着差异的主要原因是两个主要因素:(a)使用率低和(b)与平台和内容相关的问题。使用率低可能阻止了学生足够长时间暴露在平台上,从而在群体之间造成差异。此外,定性发现可以部分解释使用率偏低的原因,这表明无心学习和疲倦的师生对这项研究并不热心,因为它发生在学年末。此外,在整个研究过程中,计算机访问是学校中一个具有挑战性的问题。另一方面,与平台和内容相关的问题可以抑制平台的潜在利益。三个突出的问题是:(a)大多数学生觉得内容乏味或困难,(b)自适应平台的反复推荐令人沮丧,并且(c)进度条勉强移动导致参与者失望。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bicer, Alpay.;

  • 作者单位

    Arizona State University.;

  • 授予单位 Arizona State University.;
  • 学科 Educational technology.;Instructional design.;Mathematics education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 119 p.
  • 总页数 119
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号