首页> 外文学位 >THE EFFECTS OF COGNITIVE STYLE AND MODALITY OF STUDY ON ACHIEVEMENT IN SELF-PACED AUTO-TUTORIAL INSTRUCTION.
【24h】

THE EFFECTS OF COGNITIVE STYLE AND MODALITY OF STUDY ON ACHIEVEMENT IN SELF-PACED AUTO-TUTORIAL INSTRUCTION.

机译:自学型自学式教学中认知风格和学习方式对学习成绩的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of cognitive style and mode of study on achievement in self-paced, auto-tutorial instruction. Although previous research indicated that cognitive styles were influential in the learning process, clear and definitive findings concerning the interactive effects of cognitive style and of mode of study were not available.;The data were submitted to a two-way analysis of variance which revealed that the main effect of cognitive style was significant at the p > .001 level; however, mode of study was not. The field-independent students scored significantly higher on the achievement posttest than the field-independent students regardless of mode of study to which they were assigned. The interaction effect between cognitive style and mode of study was not statistically significant. Further analysis of the data using multiple regression analysis showed that cognitive style, years of completed formal education and learning aptitude contributed to the regression on the criterion scores at the .05 level; however, these variables accounted for only 11 percent of the variance in the criterion measure.;An initial pool of 251 Basic Medical Specialist students was tested with the Group Embedded Figures Test to ascertain their cognitive styles. From the initial pool, 119 students with clearly identifiable field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles were administered the experimental treatment. Approximately thirty students of each cognitive style were randomly assigned to either individual or group modes of study using a Training Extension Course self-paced lesson. Upon completion of the lesson, the students were administered a posttest which served as the criterion measure in this study. The posttest scores and additional data such as GEFT score, formal education, Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery General Technical and Skilled Technical Scores, mode of study, lesson exposure time and dates of the experimental treatments were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences computer program.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定自定进度的自动教程教学中认知方式和学习方式对成就的影响。尽管先前的研究表明认知风格在学习过程中具有影响力,但尚无关于认知风格和学习方式的交互作用的清晰明确的发现。;将数据提交给方差的双向分析,结果表明:认知风格的主要影响在p> .001水平上显着;但是,学习方式不是。无论分配给哪种学习方式,与成绩无关的学生在成绩后测中的得分均显着高于与成绩无关的学生。认知方式和学习方式之间的相互作用影响没有统计学意义。使用多元回归分析对数据进行的进一步分析表明,认知风格,完成正规教育的年限和学习能力有助于在0.05级的标准评分上进行回归。但是,这些变量仅占标准量度中方差的11%。;最初的251名基础医学专家学生使用小组嵌入式数字测试进行了测试,以确定他们的认知风格。从最初的库中,对119名具有明显可识别的场相关和场独立认知风格的学生进行了实验处理。使用“培训扩展课程”自定进度课程,每种认知风格的大约30名学生被随机分配到个人或小组学习模式。完成课程后,将对学生进行后测,这是本研究中的标准量度。使用社会科学统计软件包计算机分析了后测分数和其他数据,例如GEFT分数,正规教育,武装部队职业能力专长的通用技术和熟练技术分数,学习方式,课程暴露时间和实验治疗的日期。

著录项

  • 作者

    WALLACE, SQUY GERALD, JR.;

  • 作者单位

    Texas A&M University.;

  • 授予单位 Texas A&M University.;
  • 学科 Education Adult and Continuing.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1980
  • 页码 114 p.
  • 总页数 114
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号