首页> 外文学位 >A WHOLE NEW POETICS BEGINNING HERE: THEORIES OF FEMINIST LITERARY CRITICISM.
【24h】

A WHOLE NEW POETICS BEGINNING HERE: THEORIES OF FEMINIST LITERARY CRITICISM.

机译:从此开始一种全新的诗学:女性主义文学批评理论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While feminist critics were not the first to recognize the ideological import of art, they were the first to identify gender as an ideological category of experience. The radically revisionary potential of this insight has not yet been fully understood, for feminist theory questions as contingent what all previous literary theory has simply assumed to be immutable. Because assumptions about women and about gender are so much a part of our literary inheritance, a criticism that has learned to see these assumptions can transform literary theory.;Feminism is a political philosophy before it is a literary theory. Rather than attempting to develop a critical "correct line," feminists should recognize the power of our diversity. Where traditional criticisms have tended to ignore their mutual dependence, feminist criticism--with its emphasis on interdependence in place of hierarchy, on connections rather than rules--is uniquely equipped to offer a synthesis of many theories. In a sense, feminist criticism can be contrasted not with affective stylistics or Russian Formalism, but with "androcentric criticism.".;Feminist criticism challenges all previous models of aesthetic value, for in the radical disjunction of art and politics lies the creation of sexual meaning. Nevertheless, the attempt to outline evaluative criteria will never be a feminist priority. Feminist re-vision, like the formalist defamiliarization or "making strange," is primarily a process of dis/orientation. The traditional critical question--Is what we see "good"?--is less important than the feminist reinterpretation of it: What is it that we see?;Whether feminist critics choose a "gynocentric" study of women's literary history or a revisionary investigation of the symbolic uses of gender, they come up against the question of difference: how is women's writing different from men's? The puzzle of sexual asymmetry, however, is only partly a question of difference; it is as much a question of evaluation and perception. We read women as women not because they are "different," but because it is as women that they have been excluded from literary history. Effective feminist theory is more than what is looked at; it is a way of looking.
机译:尽管女权主义者并不是第一个认识到意识形态艺术意义的批评家,但他们却第一个将性别视为经验的意识形态范畴。对于女权主义理论而言,所有以前的文学理论都简单地假设是不变的,因此,对于这种女权主义理论的质疑还没有完全理解这种见解的根本修正潜力。因为关于女性和性别的假设在很大程度上是我们文学传承的一部分,所以学会了解这些假设的批评家可以改变文学理论。女权主义在成为文学理论之前是一种政治哲学。女权主义者应该尝试认识到我们多样性的力量,而不是试图发展关键的“正确路线”。在传统批评倾向于忽略它们相互依赖的地方,女权主义批评-强调相互依赖而不是等级制,关系而不是规则-具有独特的能力,可以提供许多理论的综合。从某种意义上说,女权主义的批评不能与情感文体学或俄国形式主义形成鲜明对比,而可以与“男性中心主义的批评”相提并论。女权主义的挑战挑战了所有先前的美学价值模式,因为艺术和政治的根本脱节在于性的创造。含义。尽管如此,概述评估标准的尝试绝不会成为女性主义的优先事项。女权主义的重新修正,如形式主义的陌生化或“使人感到奇怪”,主要是一个迷失方向的过程。传统的批判性问题(我们看到的是“好”吗?)不如女权主义者对它的重新解释那么重要:我们看到的是什么?;女权主义者批评家是选择对女性文学史的“女性中心”研究还是对文学史的修订在研究性别的象征性用法时,他们遇到了差异问题:女性写作与男性写作有何不同?然而,性不对称之谜只是部分差异问题。这同样是评估和感知的问题。我们把女人看成女人不是因为她们“与众不同”,而是因为她们被当作女性而被排除在文学史之外。有效的女权主义理论远非所见。这是一种看待方式。

著录项

  • 作者

    STERNHELL, CAROL RUTH.;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford University.;

  • 授予单位 Stanford University.;
  • 学科 Modern literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1983
  • 页码 448 p.
  • 总页数 448
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号