首页> 外文学位 >AN ANALYSIS OF PROPORTIONAL REASONING TOPICS IN HIGH SCHOOL CHEMISTRY FROM A COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE (PIAGET, HIERARCHICAL)
【24h】

AN ANALYSIS OF PROPORTIONAL REASONING TOPICS IN HIGH SCHOOL CHEMISTRY FROM A COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE (PIAGET, HIERARCHICAL)

机译:从认知发展的角度(Piaget,等级结构)分析高中化学的比例推理主题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study was designed to identify the levels of difficulty encountered by high school chemistry students on topics related to proportional thinking, and then to discover to what extent student performance on these selected chemistry topics was dependent on performance on selected cognitive development tasks.;Two hundred and fifteen high school chemistry students responded to a 40-item chemistry retention test following a year of chemistry classroom instruction. A series of Piagetian-like classification measures, including the Test of Logical Thinking and a battery of three Piagetian-like puzzles was also administered to each subject. Hierarchies of difficulty were constructed based on test items clustered by chemistry topic and expected cognitive skill. These hierarchies were developed using the Ordering-Theorethic Method with the McNemar Test as a measure of statistical significance. Empirically-derived hierarchies were compared to Piagetian classification and to theoretical hierarchies developed by separate panels with expertise in Piagetian theory and chemistry content.;Results of hierarchical analysis indicated that item difficulty was more dependent on cognitive skills requirements than on chemistry topic. Cognitive skills, such as inverse proportional reasoning and direct proportional reasoning with numbers other than small whole numbers, were dependent on first-order direct proportional reasoning as measured by subtests of the classification measures, but not on an overall formal operational classification.;Results confirmed that most high school chemistry students operate at the concrete operational level. Test items that contained small whole number ratios did not require formal operational skills. Some formal operational items were answered correctly by using alternative strategies such as the use of algorithms or the factor-label method.;Implications for teachers are that chemistry instruction can be improved by providing more concrete referents and properly designed demonstrations and laboratory work. Curriculum changes, including a spiral approach in which formal operational topics are visited often during the year in a pattern of ever increasing complexity is desirable. A proposed curriculum based on the findings is presented.
机译:这项研究旨在确定高中化学学生在与比例思维相关的主题上遇到的困难程度,然后发现学生在这些所选化学主题上的表现在多大程度上取决于所选认知发展任务的表现。一年的化学课堂教学后,有15名高中化学学生对40项化学保留测试进行了回应。还对每个对象进行了一系列类似于Piagetian的分类措施,包括逻辑思维测验和一系列三个Piagetian难题。基于化学主题和预期认知技能聚类的测试项目构建了难度等级。这些层次结构是使用有序理论理论和McNemar检验开发的,作为统计意义的度量。将经验派生的层次结构与Piagetian分类进行比较,并与由具有Piagetian理论和化学内容专业知识的独立小组开发的理论层次结构进行比较。;层次分析的结果表明,项目难度更多地取决于认知技能要求,而不是化学主题。认知技能(例如反比例推理和直接比例推理以及除小整数以外的数字)依赖于通过分类度量的子测试测量的一阶直接比例推理,而不依赖于整体形式化操作分类。大多数高中化学专业的学生都在具体操作水平上进行操作。整数比例小的测试项目不需要正式的操作技能。通过使用其他策略,例如使用算法或因子标记方法,可以正确地回答一些正式的操作项目。对教师的启示是,通过提供更多具体的参考对象和经过适当设计的演示和实验室工作,可以改进化学教学。需要课程的变化,包括采用螺旋方法,在这种方法中,一年中经常以越来越复杂的方式访问正式的操作主题。提出了基于发现的建议课程。

著录项

  • 作者

    RUMSEY, STEPHEN REED.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Albany.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Albany.;
  • 学科 Science education.
  • 学位 Educat.D.
  • 年度 1986
  • 页码 111 p.
  • 总页数 111
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号