首页> 外文学位 >A test of the job demands-control and person-environment fit models of occupational stress as predictors of burnout in human service workers.
【24h】

A test of the job demands-control and person-environment fit models of occupational stress as predictors of burnout in human service workers.

机译:对工作压力的控制要求和人与环境的拟合模型的测试,作为职业服务人员倦怠的预测指标。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The primary purpose of this study is to apply Karasek's (1979) Job Demands-Control model to burnout. Second, the importance of supportive social relationships is evaluated. Third, P-E fit's prediction that "goodness of fit" between characteristics of the person and the job influence strain, is evaluated. Finally, a more refined analysis is made of the component parts of demands and control.; The sample represented workers from employment and guidance services. Of 304 staff, 188 participated. Subjects completed the Job Content Survey (Karasek, 1985). However, in addition to evaluating actual job characteristics, they also indicated how they preferred them to be. This enabled P-E fit to be assessed. Three sources of support were examined: supervisor; coworkers; and others (House, 1981a). Burnout was evaluated by the Maslach Burnout Inventory (Maslach & Jackson, 1986).; Findings. (1) Karasek's model was partially supported. The highest degree of burnout was reported by respondents with high demands and low control. However, this finding was due to the combined additive effects of demands and control, and not to the excess of demands over control. (2) Skill discretion was related to burnout, but decision authority was not. (3) Supervisor support was associated with emotional exhaustion and depersonalization; co-worker support was associated with personal accomplishment. (4) Emotional exhaustion was more likely to be reported by younger, more educated workers with high demands, low skill discretion, and low supervisor support. (5) Depersonalization was also best predicted by education, age, job demands, skill discretion, and supervisor support. (6) Job demands were not associated with personal accomplishment. Those with reduced accomplishment had less education, low skill discretion and low co-worker support. (7) Fit on skill discretion explained significantly more variance in personal accomplishment beyond the actual level, but not in emotional exhaustion, or depersonalization. (8) Demands associated with having an excessive amount of work were more strongly related to burnout than number of clients and hours in direct contact. (9) Influence over one's own work activities were more strongly associated with burnout than influence over organizational policy.; Conclusions. Stressors within the work environment are the major contributing factors to burnout, as opposed to "goodness of fit."
机译:这项研究的主要目的是将Karasek(1979)的工作需求控制模型应用于职业倦怠。其次,评估了支持性社会关系的重要性。第三,评估了P-E拟合的预测,即人的特征与工作影响力之间的“拟合优度”。最后,对需求和控制的组成部分进行了更精细的分析。样本代表了就业和指导服务中的工人。在304名员工中,有188名参加了。受试者完成了工作内容调查(Karasek,1985)。但是,除了评估实际的工作特征外,他们还指出了他们偏爱自己的情况。这使P-E适合度得以评估。审查了三种支持来源:主管;合作伙伴;和其他(House,1981a)。倦怠由Maslach倦怠量表(Maslach&Jackson,1986)评估。发现。 (1)Karasek的模型得到了部分支持。需求量高,控制力低的受访者认为,倦怠程度最高。但是,这一发现是由于需求和控制的综合累加效应所致,而不是由于需求超出控制所致。 (2)技能自由裁量权与倦怠有关,但决定权与否无关。 (3)主管的支持与情绪疲惫和人格解体有关;同事的支持与个人成就感相关。 (4)情绪疲惫的可能性更大,是年轻的,受过良好教育的,要求高,技能判断力低,主管支持低的工人。 (5)个性化也最好由教育程度,年龄,工作需求,技能判断力和主管支持来预测。 (6)工作要求与个人成就无关。成就不佳的人受教育程度较低,技能判断力较低,同事的支持率较低。 (7)运用技巧自由裁量权可以显着说明个人成就超出实际水平的更多差异,但不能消除情绪疲惫或人格解体。 (8)与工作量过多相关的需求与倦怠的关系比与客户数量和直接联系时间的关系更大。 (9)对职业生涯的影响与职业倦怠的关系要比对组织政策的影响强。结论。工作环境中的压力源是导致倦怠的主要因素,而不是“健康度”。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rafferty, Yvonne.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Stony Brook.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Stony Brook.;
  • 学科 Psychology Industrial.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1987
  • 页码 390 p.
  • 总页数 390
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 工业心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号