首页> 外文学位 >China's only child: The impact on early childhood education and family childrearing.
【24h】

China's only child: The impact on early childhood education and family childrearing.

机译:中国唯一的孩子:对幼儿教育和家庭育儿的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In 1979, in an effort to control its over-population problem, the government of the People's Republic of China decreed that no family could have more than one child, with few exceptions. In recent years, claims have appeared that only children are different from previous generations--most say they are pampered or "spoiled," some say they are pressured toward high achievement. This thesis studies the question of how kindergartens and families are raising only children in the era of the single child policy, focusing on achievement goals and discipline methods.;During ten months of ethnographic fieldwork, data were collected at two primary sites, urban kindergartens in northern China. One was a large, elite, university kindergarten; the other an average-sized, working class, neighborhood kindergarten.;Two groups of children, the "democratic" or best behaved and the "spoiled" or worst behaved, were observed. The children were divided into these groups by their teachers, based on a Chinese theory which emphasized classroom behaviors and parental discipline styles. The observations, which focused on the children's daily routines and behaviors and the teachers' management of misbehaviors and interactions with these children, tried to understand how teachers see and label children. The study also wanted to see if teachers from these two different kinds of kindergartens had different expectations of and interactions with "democratic" and "spoiled" children.;The study found that in the two schools the "democratic" and "spoiled" children did not exhibit distinguishable differences in strengths and weaknesses as reported by their teachers. Also, contrary to Chinese educators' theories, parents of the "democratic" and "spoiled" children did not report differences in their discipline methods. Nonetheless, most of the children of parents who were college educated were labeled "democratic" by teachers, whereas most of the children of parents who only had a middle school education were labeled "spoiled," especially at the University School. The study proposes that parental status is as much a factor in the labeling as are children's behaviors or parenting style.;The thesis concludes with comments about changes in the family and with concerns about the strained relationships between teachers, parents, and grandparents. The study emphasizes the need for further research about only children, especially highlighting the concern for "two faced" children who need to cope with contrasting school and home environments.
机译:1979年,为了控制其人口过剩的问题,中华人民共和国政府颁布法令,除了少数例外,任何家庭最多只能生育一个孩子。近年来,有人声称只有孩子与前几代人不同-多数人说他们受到宠爱或“宠坏”,有些人则说他们面临着取得高成就的压力。本文研究了在独生子女政策时代,幼儿园和家庭如何养育独生子女的问题,着重于成就目标和纪律方法。在民族志学田野调查的十个月中,收集了两个主要地点的数据,即城市的幼儿园。中国北方。其中一个是大型的精英大学幼儿园;另一组是中等规模的工人阶级邻里幼儿园。观察到两组儿童,“民主”或表现最好,而“宠坏”或表现最差。根据强调教室行为和父母纪律风格的中国理论,孩子们将他们的老师分为这些小组。这些观察集中于儿童的日常活动和行为,以及教师对不良行为的管理以及与这些儿童的互动,旨在了解教师如何看待和标记儿童。该研究还希望了解这两种幼儿园的教师对“民主”和“宠坏”的孩子是否有不同的期望和互动。该研究发现,在这两家学校中,“民主”和“宠坏”的孩子确实没有表现出老师报告的优势和劣势的明显差异。而且,与中国教育者的理论相反,“民主”和“宠坏”的孩子的父母没有报告他们的纪律方法的差异。但是,大多数受过大学教育的父母的孩子被老师标记为“民主的”,而大多数只有中学教育的父母的孩子被标记为“被宠坏的”,尤其是在大学学校。这项研究提出,父母身份与儿童的行为或父母的养育方式一样,也是标签中的一个因素。本文的结论是对家庭的变化发表评论,并对教师,父母和祖父母之间关系紧张的问题表示关注。该研究强调有必要对独生子女进行进一步研究,特别是对“两面子”儿童需要应对的学校和家庭环境造成的关注。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fong, Rowena.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Early childhood education.;Developmental psychology.;Bilingual education.;Individual family studies.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 1990
  • 页码 246 p.
  • 总页数 246
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号