首页> 外文学位 >Task, mode and the effects of input-based explicit instruction.
【24h】

Task, mode and the effects of input-based explicit instruction.

机译:任务,模式和基于输入的显式指令的效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Ten years have gone by since Long published his article entitled "Does instruction make a difference?" (1983). Since then, a number of studies have been published that provide evidence in favor of the positive effects of instruction and the limitations of those effects on different aspects of SLA. Experimental research has mainly concentrated on what to teach. However, psycholinguistic-based studies such as VanPatten (1991) and VanPatten and Cadierno (1993) represent an attempt to answer the question on how instruction can make a difference in L2 knowledge. The experimental study presented here seeks to investigate where the difference is made, more specifically, what kind of knowledge is gained and how this knowledge can be put to use.;In this experiment, 44 native speakers of English learning Spanish in a formal context where tested with the help of multiple assessment tasks. The tasks differ in the amount of production they required, and consist of a sentence completion, a structured interview and a video retelling. All tasks were performed in the written and the oral modes. The type of instruction investigated, Processing Instruction (VanPatten 1991) had as its goal the manipulation of a well known strategy (first-noun strategy) used by learners when processing input. The data were scored for use of pre-verbal object pronouns in Spanish and were submitted to different 2-way ANOVAs with repeated measures on the following variables: instructional effects (pre-test vs. post-test), mode (written vs. oral), and elicitation task (sentence completion vs. question-answer vs. video clip narration).;The results show a positive effect for instruction across all three task types and differential effects according to the elicitation technique and the mode of production, which are explained based on the differences in processing demands made on the subject; i.e., production of long chunks of speech requires automatic access to knowledge, while completing a sentence in the written mode can be done using controlled access to knowledge.;The outcome of this study has implications for SLA theory, research methodology and teaching pedagogy, which are all discussed in the last chapter.
机译:自从朗发表他的文章“指导是否有所作为?”已经过去了十年。 (1983)。自那时以来,已经发表了许多研究,这些研究提供了有利于指导的积极效果以及这些效果对SLA不同方面的局限性的证据。实验研究主要集中在教什么。但是,基于心理语言学的研究(例如VanPatten(1991)以及VanPatten和Cadierno(1993))代表了一种尝试,以回答关于教学如何使L2知识有所作为的问题。此处进行的实验研究旨在调查差异在何处产生,更具体地说,是获取什么样的知识以及如何利用这些知识。在此实验中,有44位以英语为母语的母语人士在正式的环境中学习西班牙语。在多项评估任务的帮助下进行了测试。这些任务在所需的制作量上有所不同,包括完成句子,结构化的采访和录像复述。所有任务均以书面和口头方式执行。研究的指令类型“处理指令”(VanPatten 1991)的目标是操纵学习者在处理输入时使用的众所周知的策略(第一名词策略)。对数据进行西班牙语口头宾语代词评分,然后将其提交给不同的2方差分析,并对以下变量进行重复测量:教学效果(测试前与测试后),模式(书面与口头) )和启发任务(句子完成vs.问题解答vs.视频剪辑旁白);结果表明,对这三种任务类型的教学都具有积极的效果,并且根据启发技术和制作方式对效果产生了不同的影响根据对主题的处理要求的差异进行解释;也就是说,长篇演讲的产生需要自动获取知识,而在书面模式下完成句子可以使用对知识的受控访问来完成。本研究的结果对SLA理论,研究方法和教学法具有重要意义。在上一章中都有讨论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sanz Alcala, Cristina.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Education Language and Literature.;Education Tests and Measurements.;Language Linguistics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1994
  • 页码 201 p.
  • 总页数 201
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 语言学;教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号