首页> 外文学位 >Russian income policy and interest groups: An illusion of corporatism.
【24h】

Russian income policy and interest groups: An illusion of corporatism.

机译:俄罗斯的收入政策和利益集团:对公司主义的幻想。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dissertation is a case study of Russia's six largest labor and business associations and their participation in making of the national income policy in 1994-95. It focuses on the associations' organizational structure and their relations with one another and with the state. The minimum wage indexation and management of the Single Tariff System were selected as the income policy issues. The policy coordination among the associations and the effectiveness of their participation in the policy process were examined. The dissertation framework distinguishes between four major types of interest intermediation and their combinations: pluralism, corporatism, syndicalism, and monism.; The author claims that the organizational structure and political networks of the six labor and business associations are indicative of a pluralist form of interest intermediation. Most associations are loosely organized and have little control over their members. They regularly compete with one another both for membership and influence on government policy. This pluralist pattern of interest group organization resulted from the decentralization of Russia's trade unions in the late 1980s and subsequent disagreements which arose among the associations over Russia's economic reforms and union organization.; On the policy process test, minimum wage indexation and management of the Single Tariff System are closer to a monist pattern. All stages and the output of the policy process are clearly dominated by the government. The primary reason for the monist pattern is that the government transformed both the minimum wage and the ETS into a tool of macroeconomic planning.; The coexistence of the pluralist organization of labor and business associations and the monist pattern of policy making can be a result of the transitional character of Russian politics at the moment.
机译:本文以俄罗斯六个最大的劳工和商业协会及其在1994-95年参与制定国民收入政策为例。它关注于协会的组织结构以及它们之间以及与国家的关系。选择了最低工资指数化和单一关税制度的管理作为收入政策问题。研究了协会之间的政策协调及其在政策制定过程中参与的有效性。论文框架区分了利益中介的四种主要类型及其组合:多元性,社团主义,辛迪加主义和一元论。作者声称,六个劳工和商业协会的组织结构和政治网络表明了利益中介的多元化形式。大多数协会组织松散,对其成员几乎没有控制权。他们经常在成员资格和对政府政策的影响方面相互竞争。利益集团组织的这种多元化模式是由于1980年代末俄罗斯工会的权力下放以及随后各协会之间就俄罗斯的经济改革和工会组织产生分歧所致。在政策过程测试中,最低工资指数化和单一关税制度的管理更接近一元模式。政策过程的所有阶段和产出显然都由政府主导。一元主义模式的主要原因是政府将最低工资和ETS都转变为宏观经济计划的工具。劳工和商业协会的多元化组织的共存和政策制定的一元论模式可能是当前俄罗斯政治过渡特征的结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Loshakov, Andrew A.;

  • 作者单位

    Northern Illinois University.;

  • 授予单位 Northern Illinois University.;
  • 学科 Economics Labor.; Political Science General.; Sociology Industrial and Labor Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 292 p.
  • 总页数 292
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 劳动经济;政治理论;社会学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号