首页> 外文学位 >Organizational quality in higher education: An examination of the Baldrige framework in the university work environment.
【24h】

Organizational quality in higher education: An examination of the Baldrige framework in the university work environment.

机译:高等教育的组织质量:在大学工作环境中对Baldrige框架的考察。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) has been piloted in educational organizations, little research has been conducted to empirically examine the MBNQA framework in higher educational organizations. The purpose of this study was to test the major predictive relationships of the MBNQA framework in the non-instructional university work environment.; Seven dimensions of organizational quality are identified in the MBNQA: leadership, information analysis, strategic planning, human resource management, process management, performance results, and customer focus. The predictive relationships between these dimensions were analyzed based on a survey of over 10,000 executive, professional, administrative, office, technical, and maintenance employees at a major research university.; Path analysis was used to measure the strengths of the relationships among the dimensions. Structural equation modeling (LISREL) was used to determine whether the overall predictive relationships asserted by the Baldrige framework were plausible.; The leadership dimension was found to have a strong effect on the four system dimensions (information utilization, strategic planning, human resource management, and process management). Surprisingly, the leadership dimension had almost no direct effect on the outcome dimensions (performance results and customer focus). The human resource management dimension had a strong effect on the performance results outcome dimension, while the strategic planning dimension had a strong effect on the customer focus outcome dimension. Only the process management dimension had a strong effect on both outcome dimensions. The study suggests that institutional leaders interested in improving performance and customer focus should emphasize organizational work process improvements.; The plausibility of the overall Baldrige framework was rejected based on a low "goodness-of-fit" statistic produced by the structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis. The study offers an alternative conceptual framework of organizational quality based on an exploratory SEM analysis.
机译:尽管马尔科姆·鲍德里奇国家质量奖(MBNQA)已在教育组织中试行,但很少进行研究以实证检验高等教育组织中的MBNQA框架。这项研究的目的是在非教学性大学工作环境中测试MBNQA框架的主要预测关系。 MBNQA中确定了组织质量的七个维度:领导力,信息分析,战略计划,人力资源管理,流程管理,绩效结果和客户关注。基于对一所主要研究型大学的10,000多名行政,专业,行政,办公室,技术和维护员工的调查,分析了这些维度之间的预测关系。路径分析用于衡量维度之间关系的强度。使用结构方程模型(LISREL)来确定Baldrige框架所断言的整体预测关系是否合理。发现领导力维度对四个系统维度(信息利用,战略计划,人力资源管理和流程管理)有很大影响。令人惊讶的是,领导力维度几乎对结果维度(绩效结果和客户关注)没有直接影响。人力资源管理维度对绩效结果成果维度有很大的影响,而战略计划维度对客户关注的成果维度有很大的影响。只有过程管理维度对两个结果维度都有很大的影响。研究表明,对提高绩效和关注客户感兴趣的机构领导者应强调组织工作流程的改进。基于结构方程模型(SEM)分析产生的低“拟合优度”统计量,拒绝了整个Baldrige框架的合理性。这项研究基于探索性SEM分析提供了组织质量的替代概念框架。

著录项

  • 作者

    Winn, Bradley Alexander.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.; Education Administration.; Psychology Industrial.; Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 169 p.
  • 总页数 169
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;教育;工业心理学;高等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号