首页> 外文学位 >Construction and analysis of linear trend-free factorial designs under a general cost structure.
【24h】

Construction and analysis of linear trend-free factorial designs under a general cost structure.

机译:一般成本结构下线性无趋势析因设计的构建和分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

When experimental units exhibit a smooth trend over time or in space, random allocation of treatments may no longer be appropriate. Instead, systematic run orders may have to be used to reduce or eliminate the effects of such a trend. The resulting designs are referred to as trend-free designs.;We consider here, in particular, linear trend-free designs for factorial treatment structures such that estimates of main effects and two-factor interactions are trend-free. In addition to trend-freeness we incorporate a general cost structure and propose methods of constructing optimal or near-optimal full or fractional factorial designs. Building upon the generalized foldover scheme (GFS) introduced by Coster and Cheng (1988) we develop a procedure of selection of foldover vectors (SFV) which is a construction method for an appropriate generator matrix. The final optimal or near-optimal design can then be developed from this generator matrix. To achieve a reduction in the amount of work, i.e., a reduction of the large number of possible generator matrices, and to make this whole process easier to use by a practitioner, we introduce the systematic selection of foldover vectors (SSFV). This method does not always produce optimal designs but in all cases practical compromise designs.;The cost structure for factorial designs can be modelled according to the number of level changes for the various factors. In general, if cost needs to be kept to a minimum, factor level changes will have to be kept at a minimum. This introduces a covariance structure for the observations from such an experiment. We consider the consequences of this covariance structure with respect to the analysis of trend-free factorial designs. We formulate an appropriate underlying mixed linear model and propose a method using simulation studies, which leads to a useful practical linear model as compared to the theoretical model, because the theoretical model is not always feasible.;Overall, we show that estimation of main effects and two-factor interactions, trend-freeness, and minimum cost cannot always be achieved simultaneously. As a consequence, compromise designs have to be considered, which satisfy requirements as much as possible and are practical at the same time. The proposed methods achieve this aim.
机译:当实验单位随时间或空间呈现平稳趋势时,随机分配治疗可能不再合适。取而代之的是,可能必须使用系统的运行命令来减少或消除这种趋势的影响。最终的设计被称为无趋势设计。;在此,我们尤其考虑因子处理结构的线性无趋势设计,这样对主效应和两因素相互作用的估计就没有趋势。除了无趋势外,我们还采用了一般的成本结构,并提出了构建最优或接近最优的全部或部分因子设计的方法。在Coster和Cheng(1988)提出的广义折叠方案(GFS)的基础上,我们开发了选择折叠矢量(SFV)的程序,这是一种适用于生成器矩阵的构造方法。然后可以从该生成器矩阵开发出最终的最佳或接近最佳的设计。为了减少工作量,即减少大量可能的生成矩阵,并使整个过程更易于从业人员使用,我们引入了对折迭向量的系统选择。这种方法并不总是能产生最佳设计,而是在所有情况下都是可行的折衷设计。可以根据各个因素的水平变化次数,对析因设计的成本结构进行建模。通常,如果需要将成本保持在最低水平,则必须将要素水平的变化保持在最低水平。这为来自这样的实验的观察引入了协方差结构。我们考虑这种协方差结构对无趋势析因设计的分析的后果。我们建立了适当的基础混合线性模型,并通过仿真研究提出了一种方法,由于理论模型并不总是可行的,因此与理论模型相比,它产生了一种有用的实用线性模型。而且两因素互动,趋势自由和最低成本不可能总是同时实现。结果,必须考虑折衷设计,该折衷设计尽可能地满足要求并且是实用的。所提出的方法实现了该目的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kim, Kiho.;

  • 作者单位

    Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.;

  • 授予单位 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.;
  • 学科 Statistics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 97 p.
  • 总页数 97
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号