首页> 外文学位 >Imparting knowledge: A comparison of instructional methods and other factors that influence knowledge levels in adult students of engineering management.
【24h】

Imparting knowledge: A comparison of instructional methods and other factors that influence knowledge levels in adult students of engineering management.

机译:传授知识:比较教学方法和其他影响工程管理成年学生知识水平的因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study compares the effectiveness of a course of study in which the instructional methods employed are primarily experimental in nature with a course in which the methods used are primarily lecture and discussion. Education is moving toward a more applications oriented approach to the classroom experience, yet much of the research in the field has either not addressed the issue of the relative effectiveness of alternative methods in sufficient depth, or, for various reasons, the research has been inconclusive. The subjects in this study were adult students in an engineering management course taught at the Defense Systems Management College. A pretest-posttest control group experimental design was employed involving a control group that numbered 360 and a treatment group of 420. The control group was taught using lecture discussion methods, and the treatment group was provided an experientially based project which featured a design problem that required students to plan for, design, build, and test a small vehicle to meet specified performance and cost objectives. The results support the conclusions that students react more favorably to experiential methods (p = 0.0000), students learn more when experiential methods are used (p = 0.0001), and students are more likely to transfer learning to the workplace when experiential methods are employed (p = 0.0003). In addition, the analyses supported earlier work that found no significant relationship between student reactions and learning in the courses evaluated.;Secondary analyses investigated the factors that were most influential in determining initial levels of student technical management knowledge prior to exposure to the course of training. Among the findings were that education level, type of education, program management experience, and the nature of prior training courses attended were most influential, while the type of job most recently held and the interval elapsed since prerequisite training courses were attended were not significant at the 95% level of confidence.
机译:这项研究比较了以教学方法为主要实验性质的研究课程与以教学和讨论为主要方法的课程的有效性。教育正在朝着一种更加面向应用程序的课堂体验方法发展,然而,该领域的许多研究要么没有足够深入地探讨替代方法的相对有效性问题,要么由于各种原因,该研究尚无定论。 。本研究的主题是在国防系统管理学院教授的工程管理课程中的成年学生。采用了测试前-测试后对照组的实验设计,其中包括一个编号为360的对照组和一个420的治疗组。该对照组使用讲座讨论方法进行教学,并且为治疗组提供了一个基于经验的项目,该项目具有设计问题,要求学生规划,设计,制造和测试小型车辆,以满足指定的性能和成本目标。结果支持以下结论:学生对体验式方法的反应更佳(p = 0.0000),使用体验式方法的学生学习更多(p = 0.0001),并且当采用体验式方法的学生更有可能将学习转移到工作场所( p = 0.0003)。此外,这些分析支持了先前的工作,即在所评估的课程中学生的反应与学习之间没有显着的关系。;中学分析调查了在接触培训课程之前确定学生技术管理知识的初始水平方面最有影响力的因素。结果表明,教育水平,教育类型,计划管理经验以及参加过的先前培训课程的性质最具影响力,而最近从事的工作类型和自从参加必要的培训课程以来的时间间隔并不重要。 95%的置信度。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lightsey, Robert H.;

  • 作者单位

    The George Washington University.;

  • 授予单位 The George Washington University.;
  • 学科 Adult education.;Management.;Curriculum development.;Industrial arts education.
  • 学位 D.Sc.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 259 p.
  • 总页数 259
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号