首页> 外文学位 >Defending Lilliput: Domestic cultural industry development schemes and the world trade regime (Australia, Canada, South Africa).
【24h】

Defending Lilliput: Domestic cultural industry development schemes and the world trade regime (Australia, Canada, South Africa).

机译:捍卫小人国:国内文化产业发展计划和世界贸易体制(澳大利亚,加拿大,南非)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis investigates the increasingly tenuous position of domestic cultural industry development schemes, particularly for film, television and music, within the world trade regime. The common justifications for the deployment of such schemes are outlined, and the various methodologies adopted by countries to support their cultural industries, e.g. broadcast quotas, tax breaks, direct subsidies, and foreign ownership restrictions, are examined by way of value chain analysis. The WTO regime is then introduced, and the application of the GATS to audiovisual products is examined. The history and outcomes of such schemes in Australia, Canada and South Africa are specifically discussed, with particular attention being paid to Project Blue Sky Inc. v Australian Broadcasting Authority. The "public morals" exception is considered as a possible escape route for the retention of broadcast quotas, and the thesis concludes with an examination of the current Canadian initiative to build an international coalition for the creation of specific rules on international trade in cultural products.
机译:本文研究了国内文化产业发展计划,尤其是电影,电视和音乐在世界贸易体制中日益脆弱的地位。概述了部署此类计划的共同理由,以及各国为支持其文化产业而采用的各种方法,例如:通过价值链分析来检查广播配额,税收减免,直接补贴和外国所有权限制。然后引入了WTO体制,并研究了GATS在视听产品中的应用。特别讨论了此类计划在澳大利亚,加拿大和南非的历史和结果,并特别关注了Blue Sky Inc.诉澳大利亚广播管理局。 “公共道德”例外被认为是保留广播配额的一种可能的逃脱途径,并且论文的结尾是对加拿大目前为建立国际联盟以建立文化产品国际贸易的具体规则而建立国际联盟的倡议进行了研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号