首页> 外文期刊>Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change >Advancing the climate regime through linking domestic emission trading systems? (Special Issue: Linking Domestic Emissions Trading Schemes and the Evolution of the International Climate Regime: Bottom-up Support of Top-Down Processes?)
【24h】

Advancing the climate regime through linking domestic emission trading systems? (Special Issue: Linking Domestic Emissions Trading Schemes and the Evolution of the International Climate Regime: Bottom-up Support of Top-Down Processes?)

机译:通过联系国内排放交易系统来推进气候制度? (特刊:将国内排放权交易计划与国际气候制度的演变联系起来:自上而下的自下而上的支持?)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

More and more countries are incorporating the instrument of emissions trading into their national climate policies. This emerging mosaic of emissions trading schemes (ETS) raises the question of whether they should be linked with each other. From an economic point of view, linking of domestic schemes is supposed to increase the economic efficiency of carbon markets. In addition, linking is also expected by some to yield substantial political benefits in terms of the evolution of the UNFCCC/Kyoto regime. However, these optimistic prospects are based on a best-case scenario where all major countries establish environmentally effective emissions trading systems and then link them with each other. Real-life politics might develop rather differently. This paper therefore examines to what extent the current status of emissions trading in industrialised countries provides a basis for reinforcing and moving forward the international climate regime through linking domestic ETS. After comparing emerging emissions trading schemes from an institutional perspective, it emerges that not only emissions trading is at a very early stage in most countries, in addition the emerging systems are probably going to be designed very differently from the EU ETS. While for some design features such as the coverage design differences do not matter, there are some areas where the plans in many non-EU countries look crucially different from the EU system. The outlook for a linked international ETS is therefore currently still very uncertain. Given this state of affairs, the EU should pro-actively engage with the non-EU countries to try to harmonise their developing national emissions trading schemes with the EU ETS, widely disseminate the lessons it has learned from the EU ETS, strongly make the case for environmental integrity and at the same time make clear that systems that want to link to the EU ETS will need to meet certain quality criteria.
机译:越来越多的国家正在将排放权交易工具纳入其国家气候政策。排放交易计划(ETS)的这种新出现提出了一个问题,即它们是否应该相互联系。从经济学的角度来看,将国内计划联系起来可以提高碳市场的经济效率。此外,随着《气候公约》 /《京都议定书》制度的演变,一些人还期望这种联系能够产生巨大的政治利益。但是,这些乐观的前景是建立在最佳情况的基础上的,在这种情况下,所有主要国家都建立了对环境有效的排放交易系统,然后将它们彼此联系在一起。现实生活中的政治可能会有所不同。因此,本文探讨了工业化国家排放交易的现状在多大程度上为通过联系国内ETS加强和推进国际气候制度提供了基础。从制度的角度比较新兴的排放权交易计划后,发现不仅大多数国家的排放权交易还处于初期阶段,而且新兴系统的设计可能与欧盟ETS截然不同。尽管对于某些设计功能(例如覆盖范围)而言,设计差异并不重要,但在某些领域中,许多非欧盟国家/地区的计划与欧盟体系看起来截然不同。因此,目前联系国际ETS的前景仍然非常不确定。鉴于这种情况,欧盟应积极与非欧盟国家接触,以使其发展中的国家排放贸易计划与欧盟排放交易体系协调一致,广泛传播其从欧盟排放交易体系中汲取的经验教训,有力地证明这一点。为了确保环境完整性,同时明确指出要链接到EU ETS的系统将需要满足某些质量标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号