首页> 外文学位 >Measuring emotional intelligence of Chinese university students: A validation study.
【24h】

Measuring emotional intelligence of Chinese university students: A validation study.

机译:测量中国大学生的情绪智力:一项验证研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Emotional intelligence (EI) has been studied extensively in the past 10 years. However, to date most of the studies have concentrated on the North American and European cultural context. In this study I intended to address this shortfall by assessing the measurement equivalence of two EI measures [Le. Wong & Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS) developed in Hong Kong, and College Achievement Inventory (CAI) developed in Canada], and examining the original factor structure of both relative to the factor structure obtained in the present study. Two studies were conducted - one in Beijing (N=680), which included participants from Beijing Normal University and other Beijing universities, and the other in Calgary, which included Chinese students who were administered the instruments in either Chinese or English. Results indicated the WLEIS has satisfactory reliability across all four groups, the four-factor structure was replicated, and configural and metric invariance were supported across four groups. In contrast, results from the CAI analysis indicated the internal consistency reliability for the four subscales of the CAI were not acceptable, and the original four-factor structure was not replicated in any of the four groups. These findings suggest that EI measures are not transportable across cultural contexts, probably due to cultural differences, and that further research should be cautious of the cultural bias in an EI measure, and measurement equivalence should be investigated in EI cross-cultural studies.
机译:在过去的10年中,对情商(EI)进行了广泛的研究。但是,迄今为止,大多数研究都集中在北美和欧洲的文化背景下。在本研究中,我打算通过评估两个EI度量的等效性来解决这一不足[Le。在香港建立了Wong&Law情绪智力量表(WLEIS),在加拿大建立了大学成就量表(CAI),并研究了两者相对于本研究获得的原始因素结构。进行了两项研究-一项是在北京(N = 680),其中包括北京师范大学和其他北京大学的参与者;另一项是在卡尔加里,其中包括使用中文或英文进行管理的中国学生。结果表明,WLEIS在所有四个组中均具有令人满意的可靠性,复制了四因素结构,并在四个组中支持了配置和度量不变性。相比之下,CAI分析的结果表明,CAI的四个子量表的内部一致性可靠性是不可接受的,并且原始的四因素结构在四个组中的任何一个中均未复制。这些发现表明,EI措施在跨文化环境中不可迁移,这可能是由于文化差异造成的,并且进一步的研究应谨慎对待EI措施中的文化偏见,并且应在EI跨文化研究中调查度量的等效性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Li, Tongwei.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Calgary (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Calgary (Canada).;
  • 学科 Psychology Cognitive.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 217 p.
  • 总页数 217
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:36:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号