首页> 外文学位 >The secret of technics: Toward an ethical politics of technological society (Francis Bacon, Martin Heidegger, Jacques Derrida, Hannah Arendt).
【24h】

The secret of technics: Toward an ethical politics of technological society (Francis Bacon, Martin Heidegger, Jacques Derrida, Hannah Arendt).

机译:技术的秘密:迈向技术社会的伦理政治(弗朗西斯·培根,马丁·海德格尔,雅克·德里达,汉娜·阿伦特)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The questions critics have typically asked of modern technology have focused on whether we are in control of our machines or whether they now have control over us. And questions concerning the ethics of technology have tended to revolve around some form of this conceptual approach. My dissertation, in contrast, argues that the ethical problematic of technology must begin from the question of how technology fundamentally affects ethics and how ethical relation happens under these technologically affected conditions. The dominant critical view of technology as a process or operation aimed at securing greater control and mastery is no doubt correct, but if technology tends to proceed by substituting for one activity or arrangement a more manageable and predictable system or technical artifice, this substitution itself does not always generate the desired or expected results. Indeed, technological substitution can be responsible for a variety of emergent social arrangements and practices far more contingent, equivocal, and unpredictable than many critics tend to recognize. The consequences of this strange characteristic of technology for selves and social relations is what this dissertation analyzes. It argues for a new techno-ethics of public political life, that strives to be responsible to what resists the transparency of publicity, to the emergent secrecy of technologically affected selves, society, and social relations.; Chapters I and II argue that a more robust critical theory of technology must rethink the relation of technological transparency to secrecy by examining the operations of substitution and artificial duplication through which technology essentially proceeds. Chapter III sets out on this trajectory with an analysis of the thought of Martin Heidegger. It is what I take to be the limits of Heidegger's philosophy that directs chapter IV to consider Jacques Derrida's work on the logic of repetition and substitution. Chapter V develops from Derrida and Hannah Arendt a notion of technological spectrality as a new premise of ethical and political relation. I argue that in the equivocal play of transparency and secrecy, technology becomes a rich resource for reimagining public life and for the invention of potentially more ethical and just socio-political associations.
机译:评论家通常对现代技术提出的问题集中在我们是在控制机器还是现在在控制我们。关于技术伦理的问题倾向于围绕这种概念方法的某种形式展开。相反,我的论文认为,技术的伦理问题必须从以下问题开始:技术如何从根本上影响伦理,以及在这些受技术影响的条件下伦理关系如何发生。毫无疑问,将技术视为旨在确保更好地控制和掌握的过程或操作的主流批判观点是正确的,但是如果技术趋向于通过替代一项活动或安排来进行更易于管理和更可预测的系统或技术手段来进行,那么这种替代本身就可以做到。并非总是产生预期或预期的结果。的确,技术替代可以导致各种新兴的社会安排和实践,远比许多批评家所认为的更为偶然,模棱两可和不可预测。本论文分析了这种奇怪的技术特征对自我和社会关系的影响。它主张建立新的公共政治生活技术伦理,努力对抵制公开透明性的事物,对受技术影响的自我,社会和社会关系的紧急保密负责。第一章和第二章认为,更健壮的技术批判理论必须通过研究替代技术和人为复制的操作来重新思考技术透明性与保密性之间的关系。第三章阐述了这一轨迹,并分析了马丁·海德格尔的思想。我认为海德格尔哲学的局限性使第四章考虑了雅克·德里达关于重复和替代逻辑的著作。第五章是从德里达和汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)提出来的,将技术频谱概念作为伦理和政治关系的新前提。我认为,在透明和保密的模棱两可的过程中,技术成为重新构想公共生活以及发明更多可能具有道德和社会政治联系的丰富资源。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cooper, Roger Allen.;

  • 作者单位

    Duke University.;

  • 授予单位 Duke University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 441 p.
  • 总页数 441
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;哲学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号