首页> 外文学位 >The quality of evil: Suffering and evil in process and narrative theologies.
【24h】

The quality of evil: Suffering and evil in process and narrative theologies.

机译:邪恶的本质:过程和叙述神学中的痛苦与邪恶。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In order to fully address the experience of suffering and evil, one must distinguish and appropriately address qualitative differences in those experiences. Failure to do so vitiates the ability to make good moral judgments and makes it impossible to address different kinds of evil. To address these differences, I use a creative synthesis of process and narrative theologies. This synthesis is useful because while narrative can present the experience of suffering and evil, it cannot analyze it. At the same time, while process can analyze evil, it cannot engage or transform it, something narrative does through reconfiguration.; I describe four distinct experiences of evil. The first is the tragic, which describes the experience of suffering as an inevitable part of life. The second is the demonic, which is the experience of evil as something that precedes an individual but for which that individual is still in some way responsible. The third experience is radical evil, which describes situations in which there is no hope or creativity, something a traditional Christian approach sees as impossible. It is, however, possible to be so trapped in a distorting narrative that one cannot see alternatives to destructive action. Because consciousness is partially constitutive of reality, if one cannot see hope or creative possibility, none exists. The experience of radical evil points to a God who gives hope in the midst of hopelessness, creating something new despite the complete absence of creativity.; The final experience is radical suffering, which is suffering that leaves one mute. It is uncommunicated and cannot be incorporated into a personal narrative. Because persons are formed by their narrative, this destroys the coherence of the self and robs meaning from a entire life. Once suffering is communicated, it is no longer radical. One cannot bring meaning to the radical suffering of others, however. In this situation, all that can be done is to bear witness to the story, allowing oneself to be transformed by it.
机译:为了充分处理苦难和邪恶的经验,必须区别对待并适当解决这些经验中的质性差异。否则,将无法做出良好的道德判断,也无法应对各种邪恶。为了解决这些差异,我对过程和叙事神学进行了创造性的综合。这种综合很有用,因为尽管叙事可以表现出痛苦和邪恶的经历,但它无法对其进行分析。同时,尽管过程可以分析邪恶,但它不能参与或改变邪恶,叙事通过重新配置来完成。我描述了四种不同的邪恶经历。首先是悲剧,它描述了苦难是生活中不可避免的一部分的经历。第二个是恶魔,它是邪恶的经验,它先于个人,但仍以某种方式对该个人负责。第三种经验是激进的邪恶,它描述了没有希望或创造力的情况,而传统的基督教方法认为这是不可能的。但是,有可能陷入一种扭曲的叙述中,以至于看不到破坏性行动的替代方案。因为意识是现实的部分构成,所以如果看不到希望或创造的可能性,就不会存在。激进邪恶的经验指向了一位在绝望之中给予希望的上帝,尽管完全缺乏创造力,但他创造了新事物。最终的体验是激进的苦难,这是一种使人沉默的苦难。它是未传达的,因此不能纳入个人叙述中。因为人是由他们的叙述构成的,所以这破坏了自我的连贯性,并剥夺了整个生命的意义。一旦传达了痛苦,它就不再是激进的。但是,一个人不能给他人的根本苦难带来意义。在这种情况下,所有可以做的就是见证这个故事,让自己被故事改变。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stenmark, Lisa Lynn.;

  • 作者单位

    Vanderbilt University.;

  • 授予单位 Vanderbilt University.;
  • 学科 Theology.; Religion Philosophy of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 199 p.
  • 总页数 199
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教;宗教理论、宗教思想;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号