首页> 外文学位 >The intervention of the other: Levinas and Lacan on ethical subjectivity.
【24h】

The intervention of the other: Levinas and Lacan on ethical subjectivity.

机译:另一方的干预:列维纳斯和拉康对道德主体性的干预。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is a comparative analysis of the work of Emmanuel Lévinas and Jacques Lacan, two important thinkers in a landscape of thought roughly labeled “post-humanist.” Through a close reading of several of their most important texts, it illuminates their positions on the nature of human subjectivity in general, and ethical subjectivity in particular.;The first section of this dissertation reads key texts by Lévinas and Lacan side by side in order to see the points at which their thinking converges and the points at which their thinking diverges. In three chapters, it focuses on topics of central concern to each thinker: (a) the intervention of the other as the founding moment of subjectivity either uncovering an original goodness (Lévinas) or creating an original alienation (Lacan); (b) sexual difference as either a model for (Lévinas) or a constitutive mode of (Lacan) subjectivity; and (c) language as constitutive of subjectivity as either ethical (Lévinas) or ordered by the unconscious (Lacan). Here we come to see the ways in which Lévinas's conception of the ethical subject is representative of a “humanism of the other person” while Lacan's conception, of the split subject is representative of an anti-humanism. The second and third sections look at key texts by Lévinas and Lacan in isolation from one another. In two chapters, section two focuses on Lévinas's treatments of (a) the idea of God and (b) the concept of time as diachronous, in order to posit “an-archic” foundations for the ethical subject. Also in two chapters, section three focuses on Lacan's treatment of (a) the four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis (the unconscious, repetition, transference, and the drive) and (b) the psychoanalytic notion of “desire” as constitutive of human subjectivity, in order to explain an “ethic” of psychoanalysis as an ethic of the knowledge of the unconscious. In this, I make way for the conclusion in which I bring together these two disparate thinkers in order to posit a vision ethical of subjectivity which takes seriously Lévinas and Lacan precisely in their disagreements—a vision of the ethical subject as the “desiring subject for-the-other.”
机译:本文是对伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯(EmmanuelLévinas)和雅克·拉康(Jacques Lacan)的工作的比较分析,这两个思想家被粗略地标记为“后人道主义者”。通过仔细阅读他们的一些最重要的著作,它阐明了他们在总体上人类主体性的本质上的立场,特别是在伦理主体性上的立场。本论文的第一部分依次阅读了莱维纳斯和拉康的主要文本。看到他们的思想收敛的点和他们的思想分歧的点。在三章中,它聚焦于每个思想家最关心的主题:(a)对方的干预是主观性的奠基时刻,要么揭示原始的善意(列维纳斯),要么创造原始的异化(拉康); (b)作为(Lévinas)的模型或(Lacan)主观性的本构模式的性差异; (c)语言是主观性的构成要素,既可以是道德的(列维纳斯),也可以是无意识的命令(拉康)。在这里,我们来看看列维纳斯的道德主体概念代表“另一人的人道主义”而拉康的分裂主体概念代表反人道主义的方式。第二部分和第三部分相互隔离地考察了莱维纳斯和拉康的主要著作。在第二章中,第二部分重点讨论了莱维纳斯对(a)神的观念和(b)时间观念的历时性的对待,以便为伦理学主题奠定``古老的''基础。同样在两章中,第三节重点讨论了拉康对(a)精神分析的四个基本概念(无意识,重复,转移和动力)和(b)``精神''的心理分析概念的论述,该概念是人类主观性的组成部分,为了将精神分析的“道德”解释为无意识的知识的道德。在此,我为得出结论,让我将这两个不同的思想家聚集在一起,以提出一种主观性的道德观,这一观点认真地对待了莱维纳斯和拉康的分歧-一种将道德主题视为“理想的道德主题”的愿景。 -另一个。”

著录项

  • 作者

    Fryer, David Ross.;

  • 作者单位

    Brown University.;

  • 授予单位 Brown University.;
  • 学科 Religion Philosophy of.;Philosophy.;History European.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 203 p.
  • 总页数 203
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:06

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号