首页> 外文学位 >Political legitimacy and self-loss (Thomas Hobbes, Judith Butler).
【24h】

Political legitimacy and self-loss (Thomas Hobbes, Judith Butler).

机译:政治合法性和自我损失(托马斯·霍布斯,朱迪思·巴特勒)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation challenges liberal theories of political legitimacy by questioning the foundational status of autonomy in the spheres of consent and political obligation. I propose that we conceptualize political legitimacy as a condition of the mind and body in rapture, not as the accordance of power with law or principle. Nevertheless, one of my main contentions is that experiences such as assimilation, imitation, rapture, or what I call “self-loss,” are not categorically opposed to liberal conceptions of autonomy. I see such experiences as part of a continuous movement between self-loss and self-assertion that is constitutive of human identity. In the first chapter, I propose incorporating experiences of self-loss into the theorization of political legitimacy by questioning the pertinence of modern rationalist and social-scientific accounts of legitimacy to the perspective of those for whom power is legitimate. I then proceed with three chapters in which I elucidate the affinities between ancient, early modern and contemporary conceptualizations of identity and power. My main interlocutors in this respect are Plato, Thomas Hobbes, and Judith Butler. With my comments on these authors, I advance the argument that the experience of power can become both meaningful and conducive to self-assertion even without presupposing the autonomy or consent of political actors. Through further readings of Plato, as well as of Herodotus and Xenophon, I explore philosophical, fictional and historical depictions of techne, which I interpret as the cunning exercise of self-assertion under the guise of self-effacement. In the final chapter, I posit the idea of assertive self-loss against contemporary fears about the effects of technology on political autonomy. I argue that technology presents less of a threat to autonomy and political legitimacy as much as a way of being human that is capable of unexpected ways of asserting itself in the very course of becoming lost in the worlds of artifacts that embrace it.
机译:通过质疑同意和政治义务领域的自治的基本地位,本文对政治合法性的自由理论提出了挑战。我提议,我们将政治合法性概念化为被提的身心的条件,而不是作为法律或原则的权力依存关系。但是,我的主要论点之一是,同化,模仿,被提或我所谓的“自我丧失”之类的经历并没有与自由的自治概念完全相反。我认为这样的经历是自我丧失和自我断定之间持续不断的运动的一部分,而自我丧失和自我断言是人类身份的组成部分。在第一章中,我提议通过质疑现代理性主义者和社会科学关于合法性的论述是否与那些有权当权者的观点有关,将自我丧失的经验纳入政治合法性的理论之中。然后,我继续进行三章的阐述,以阐明古代,早期现代和当代身份和权力概念之间的联系。在这方面,我的主要对话者是柏拉图,托马斯·霍布斯和朱迪思·巴特勒。通过对这些作者的评论,我提出了这样的论点,即即使不以政治行为者的自治或同意为前提,权力的经验也可以变得有意义并有利于自我主张。通过对柏拉图以及希罗多德和色诺芬的进一步阅读,我探索了<斜体>技术的哲学,虚构和历史描写,我将其解释为以自我掩饰为掩饰的自我主张的狡猾行为。 。在最后一章中,我提出了断断续续的自我损失观念,以反对当代人们对技术对政治自治的影响的恐惧。我认为,技术对自治和政治合法性的威胁要小得多,它可以成为人类的一种方式,能够以一种意想不到的方式在迷失了它的人工制品世界中断言自己。

著录项

  • 作者

    Axelrod, Paul Scott.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Washington.;

  • 授予单位 University of Washington.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 250 p.
  • 总页数 250
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;哲学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号