首页> 外文学位 >History, civic education, and liberal democracy.
【24h】

History, civic education, and liberal democracy.

机译:历史,公民教育和自由民主。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Multiculturalism, pluralism, social historiography, and postmodernism each embody critiques of traditional history, of which national history civic education is but one extended application. These very different theories share two features. First, each conceptualizes normative history in ways that challenge traditional understandings of historical interpretation and truth. The extreme of this camp deny the existence of historical truth in favor of the historical interpretation as "all there is". The implication of this view is that all history is fiction and, consequently, that national history civic education is national fiction. Second, each plays up the significance of moral diversity and conflict between racial and ethnic groups. The extreme of this camp maintain that intense and violent ethnic value differences are basic to historical reality rather than periodic exceptions to general historical community. American history and national histories generally seem to bear this out, calling into question the propriety the traditional universalist aims of civic education (loyalty, solidarity, participation, cooperation, mutual respect, etc). Liberal and democratic "civic" theory has yet to engage these issues systematically. Much of the literature continues to assume truths central to "normal history". Much of the literature trivializes the above theoretical difficulties by presuming that the incorporation of "multiple perspectives" is sufficient to resolve problems of historical exclusion. This project attempts to bring the above strands of the history debate into the scope of liberal civic theory generally, and into the scope of theories of national history civic education in particular. The two questions the work addresses are: First, what is the historical status of civic narratives such as the narrative of the progressive liberal nation? Second, what are some of the conditions necessary in order for civic narratives to fulfill their roles in citizen-creation?
机译:多元文化主义,多元主义,社会史学和后现代主义都体现了对传统历史的批判,而国家历史公民教育只是其中的一种扩展应用。这些截然不同的理论具有两个特征。首先,每个人都以挑战传统对历史解释和真理的理解的方式概念化规范性历史。这个阵营的极端否认历史真理的存在,赞成将历史解释为“一切都存在”。这种观点的含义是,所有历史都是虚构的,因此,民族历史公民教育就是民族虚构。其次,它们各自发挥了道德多样性和种族与族裔群体之间冲突的重要性。这个阵营的极端观点认为,激烈的种族价值差异是历史现实的基础,而不是一般历史共同体的周期性例外。美国历史和民族历史通常可以证明这一点,这使传统的普遍主义公民教育目标(忠诚,团结,参与,合作,相互尊重等)受到质疑。自由民主的“公民”理论尚未系统地涉及这些问题。许多文学继续假设真理是“正常历史”的核心。许多文献通过假定“多视角”的合并足以解决历史排斥问题来平息上述理论困难。该项目试图将上述历史辩论的内容总体上纳入自由主义公民理论的范围,尤其是将其纳入国家历史公民教育理论的范围。作品要解决的两个问题是:首先,公民叙事(例如进步自由主义国家的叙事)的历史地位是什么?其次,公民叙事发挥公民创造作用的必要条件是什么?

著录项

  • 作者

    Jones, Jeffrey Douglas.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.; Education Philosophy of.; Political Science General.; Education Social Sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 154 p.
  • 总页数 154
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;教育;政治理论;社会科学教育与普及;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:46

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号