首页> 外文学位 >Failure to hold: An analysis of school violence (John Dewey, D. W. Winnicott).
【24h】

Failure to hold: An analysis of school violence (John Dewey, D. W. Winnicott).

机译:未能成立:对学校暴力的分析(约翰·杜威,D。W.温尼科特)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This work examines the public reaction to school violence in the United States in the late 1990s in an attempt to locate the disavowed aspects of democratic political culture. Repression is located at the heart of many explanations for youth violence that are central to understanding the American political imaginary as it relates to issues of childhood, adolescence, adulthood, family, human nature, reason, and psychiatric disorder and, the nature and conduct of democracy itself. Using the work of John Dewey and D. W. Winnicott, the first section examines alternative solutions to the present democratic situation in both schools and society. Next we look at three popular explanations---gun control, the effect of media violence and psychiatric illness---in an attempt to articulate the ideas they disregard and uses of culture that they deny. Finally, the work examines the school and the society's reaction to school violence as an example of containment culture, a public disposition that is motivated by fear and denial that presents itself throughout public policy and media framing towards school violence. The work underscores the impossible mission that containment culture seeks to effect: to repress the anger and rage that students feel towards the school and the society. The work cautions against the continued application of this containment policy as students will become indoctrinated into less tolerant, more censoring citizens. Democracy is at risk.
机译:这项工作研究了1990年代后期美国公众对学校暴力的反应,以试图找出民主政治文化中被拒绝的方面。压迫现象是青年暴力的多种解释的核心,这对于理解美国的政治假想至关重要,因为它涉及童年,青春期,成年,家庭,人性,理性和精神疾病以及性行为的性质。民主本身。第一节使用约翰·杜威和约翰·温尼科特的著作,探讨了学校和社会当前民主状况的替代解决方案。接下来,我们着眼于三种流行的解释-枪支管制,媒体暴力和精神疾病的影响-试图阐明他们无视的想法和他们否认的文化使用。最后,该作品考察了学校和社会对学校暴力的反应,将其作为遏制文化的一个例子,这种文化是出于恐惧和否定而引起的,在整个公共政策和媒体对学校暴力的构架中都表现出来。这项工作强调了遏制文化试图实现的不可能实现的使命:抑制学生对学校和社会的愤怒和愤怒。这项工作警告不要继续实施这种围堵政策,因为学生将被灌输给容忍度较低,审查更多的公民。民主有危险。

著录项

  • 作者

    Webber, Julie Ann.;

  • 作者单位

    Purdue University.;

  • 授予单位 Purdue University.;
  • 学科 Education Educational Psychology.; Political Science General.; Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 248 p.
  • 总页数 248
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育心理学;政治理论;哲学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号