首页> 外文学位 >Democratization and social expenditure in Latin America, 1980--1994.
【24h】

Democratization and social expenditure in Latin America, 1980--1994.

机译:1980--1994年拉丁美洲的民主化和社会支出。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation investigates the impact of democracy over social spending---controlling for economic and demographic variables---through a times-series cross-sectional data set for seventeen Latin American countries between 1980 and 1994. The central question relates to the consequences of democratization over the share of social spending in the composition of the public budget, its budgetary priority, in a period of economic crisis and adjustment.;To answer this question, I relied on the literature about political regimes and regime transitions to formulated four hypotheses. The first hypothesis takes the effects of political regimes as clear-cut; it expects democracies to be positively associated with the budgetary priority of social spending. The other three hypotheses emphasized particular situations of the first years of new democratic governments and regime transitions.;The results show that democracies had a positive impact over the budgetary priority of social spending, a finding that held up to a battery of checks. Moreover, if one defines democratization as a process of regime transition, the effects between types of political regimes are even larger. Regime transitions are a specific moment in which the higher political uncertainty that permeates strategic interaction between political actors overrides general characteristics of each type of political regime, particularly by leading transitional authoritarian incumbents to give a greater priority to social spending. By not taking the effects of regime transition into account, therefore, one may underestimate the difference between types of political regime.;I employed the same hypothesis to examine the effects of democratization over the budgetary priority of spending on the three most important social programs: Education, Health, and Social Security. Results showed that democratization would increase the budgetary priority of spending on Education and Health, but not on Social Security.
机译:本文通过1980年至1994年间为17个拉丁美洲国家设定的时间序列横截面数据,研究了民主制度对社会支出的影响-控制经济和人口变量-核心问题涉及在经济危机和调整时期,公共支出构成中的社会支出份额实现了民主化;在经济危机和调整时期,社会支出占预算的优先次序。为了回答这个问题,我依靠有关政治制度和政权转型的文献提出了四个假设。第一个假设将政治制度的影响视为明确的;它期望民主政体与社会支出的预算优先事项成正相关。其他三个假设强调了新民主政府和政权过渡初期的特殊情况。结果表明,民主制度对社会支出的预算优先事项产生了积极影响,这一发现受到了一系列的检查。此外,如果将民主化定义为政权过渡的过程,则不同类型的政治政权之间的影响会更大。政权过渡是一个特定的时刻,在该时刻,政治行为者之间战略互动的较高政治不确定性超越了每种政治体制的一般特征,特别是通过领导过渡专制统治者将社会支出放在了更高的优先位置。因此,如果不考虑政权过渡的影响,可能会低估政治政体类型之间的差异。我使用相同的假设来检验民主化对三个最重要的社会计划的预算优先支出的影响:教育,卫生和社会保障。结果表明,民主化将增加教育和卫生支出的预算优先次序,但不会增加社会保障支出。

著录项

  • 作者

    Avelino, Filho, George.;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford University.;

  • 授予单位 Stanford University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.;Political Science Public Administration.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 180 p.
  • 总页数 180
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号