首页> 外文学位 >Hegemony, religion, and Confucian Marxism (China).
【24h】

Hegemony, religion, and Confucian Marxism (China).

机译:霸权,宗教和儒家马克思主义(中国)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The twentieth century has witnessed two great waves of mass revolutions in the peripheral world. Whereas the first wave of anticolonial revolutions almost unexceptionally took place under a communist leadership, a virtually opposite pattern is to be found in recent popular movements of the periphery. In these new movements, orthodox religious communities, once thought to have lost their political strength, now constitute the strongholds of new oppositional forces. How do we explain such fundamental religious shifts in peripheral popular movements? Obviously, this “religious turn” is of utmost significance for the understanding of the postcommunist world order in general, and of religion and postcolonial politics in particular.; My dissertation seeks to address this critical issue by focusing on a similar “religious turn” in Mao's China—a distinctive cultural tradition within the Chinese Marxism that represented a conscious effort to combine Marxist radical ideals with the Confucian legacy. As both an integral part of the Chinese revolution and a religious movement, Confucian Marxism bridges the gap that separates Marxist mass revolutions from recent religious popular movements in the periphery and, hence, offers an indispensable vantage point for understanding the fall of communism and the rise of colonial religious radicalism.; The central thesis of my dissertation is the following: (a) the theory and practice of mass hegemony, which played a pivotal role in the making of the Marxist mass revolutions, is an analytical counterpart of what Weber calls “Protestant rationalism;” (b) the disparity between the discursive-organizational formation of mass hegemony and its cultural-religious roots holds the key to the “religious turn” in peripheral popular movements.
机译:二十世纪见证了外围世界两次大规模的革命浪潮。第一波反殖民革命几乎毫无例外地是在共产党领导下发生的,而在最近的外围运动中却发现了一种实际上相反的模式。在这些新运动中,曾经被认为失去了政治实力的东正教宗教团体现在构成了新的反对派力量的据点。我们如何解释外围大众运动中这种根本的宗教转变?显然,这种“宗教转向”对于理解一般的后共产主义世界秩序,特别是对宗教和后殖民政治尤其重要。我的论文旨在通过着眼于毛泽东时代中国类似的“宗教转向”来解决这一关键问题,这是中国马克思主义独特的文化传统,代表着有意识地将马克思主义激进理想与儒家传统相结合的努力。儒家马克思主义既是中国革命的重要组成部分,又是宗教运动的一部分,它弥合了将马克思主义群众革命与周边最近的宗教大众运动区分开的鸿沟,因此为理解共产主义的衰落和崛起提供了必不可少的优势。殖民宗教激进主义。我论文的中心论点如下:(a)大规模霸权的理论和实践在马克思主义的大规模革命的发展中起着举足轻重的作用,是韦伯所说的``新教理性主义''的分析对应物; (b)群众霸权的话语组织形式与其文化宗教根源之间的差异是外围大众运动中“宗教转向”的关键。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chen, Weigang.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Religion General.; Sociology General.; Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 306 p.
  • 总页数 306
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教;社会学;哲学理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:38

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号