首页> 外文学位 >Writing the earth, writing the nation: Latin American narrative and the language of geography.
【24h】

Writing the earth, writing the nation: Latin American narrative and the language of geography.

机译:写地球,写国家:拉丁美洲的叙事和地理语言。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the relationship between literary writing and geographical discourse in Domingo Faustino Sarmiento's Facundo: Civilizacion y barbarie (Argentina, 1845), Euclides da Cunha's Os Sertoes (Brazil, 1902), and Romulo Gallegos's Dona Barbara (Venezuela, 1929). These narratives are often read as locating their authority in the discourse of science or within the didactic lessons of the national allegory. I contend that both readings simplify the legacies of these works and elide the significance behind the form coupled with their content. To fully understand the politics of these mixed forms, we must move from the general (empiricist science) to the particular (geographical discourse). I defend this move by demonstrating that Sarmiento, Cunha, and Gallegos emerge as literary figures alongside, and even participate in, the formation of politically oriented geographical institutions; between 1833 and 1910 over fifty geographical societies appear across the Americas, first in Mexico and later in Brazil, Argentina, and Venezuela. This simultaneity---between literary writing and institutional formation---points to an understudied alignment between literature, geography, and politics in Latin America. I illustrate that, through a host of literary devices (e.g. metaphor, anaphora, alliteration, etc.), these writers give form to a consolidated nation-state by constructing a unified---or potentially unify-able---geographic space. By tracing how their narratives are informed by and in dialogue with previous non-Latin American land treatises (by, for example, Alexander von Humboldt, Henry Thomas Buckle, and Agustin Codazzi), I argue for the centrality of geographical discourse in literary, cultural, and social analysis. This project contributes to several conversations in the field, including the discourse of Eurocentrism, the issue of Amerindian versus Occidental epistemology, and the interconnectedness of race, inequality, and land distribution.
机译:本论文研究了多明各·福斯蒂诺·萨米恩多的《 Facundo:Civilizacion y barbarie》(阿根廷,1845年),Euclides da Cunha的《 Os Sertoes》(巴西,1902年)和Romulo Gallegos的《 Dona Barbara》(委内瑞拉,1954年)中文学作品与地理话语之间的关系。这些叙述通常被认为是在科学论述中或在国家寓言的教less课中定位自己的权威。我认为这两种读法都简化了这些作品的遗产,并消除了形式及其内容背后的意义。为了充分理解这些混合形式的政治,我们必须从一般性(经验主义科学)转向特殊性(地理论述)。我通过证明萨米恩托,库纳和加勒戈斯作为文学人物出现,甚至参与政治导向的地理机构的形成来捍卫这一举动。在1833年至1910年期间,美洲各地出现了五十多个地理学会,最早出现在墨西哥,然后出现在巴西,阿根廷和委内瑞拉。在文学写作和制度形成之间的这种同时性,表明拉丁美洲文学,地理和政治之间的研究不足。我举例说明,通过许多文学手段(例如隐喻,照应,暗示等),这些作家通过构建统一的(或可能统一的)地理空间来形成一个巩固的民族国家。通过追溯他们的叙述是如何通过以前的非拉丁美洲土地论文(例如,亚历山大·冯·洪堡,亨利·托马斯·巴克尔和奥古斯丁·科达齐)与他们进行对话的,从而为地理论述在文学,文化和文化领域的中心地位提供了支持,以及社会分析。该项目有助于在该领域进行多次对话,包括欧洲中心论的话语,美洲印第安人与西方认识论问题以及种族,不平等和土地分配的相互联系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Madan, Aarti.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pittsburgh.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pittsburgh.;
  • 学科 Literature Latin American.;Physical Geography.;History Latin American.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 263 p.
  • 总页数 263
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号