首页> 外文学位 >Unlikely alliances: Treaty conflicts and environmental cooperation between Native American and rural White communities.
【24h】

Unlikely alliances: Treaty conflicts and environmental cooperation between Native American and rural White communities.

机译:不太可能的联盟:美洲印第安人和白人农村社区之间的条约冲突和环境合作。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dissertation compares alliances of Native Americans and rural whites (particularly ranchers, farmers, and fishers) in the 1970s–2000s in Washington, Oregon, Nevada, Montana, South Dakota, Minnesota and Wisconsin. It asserts that the level of interethnic cooperation is a key element in the success or failure of a movement for protection of a multiethnic rural area. The dissertation explores how and why certain groups of rural whites and Native peoples joined to protect a natural resource (such as fish or water) that had previously been a source of conflict between them. A perceived outside threat—such as a mine, dam, power plant, transmission line, or flight or bombing range—facilitated new bonds between local Native and non-Native communities. The alliances redrew perceived community boundaries to define neighboring ethnic “outsiders” as “insiders” who are dependent on common natural resources or a land base. These “geographies of inclusion” were more pronounced in areas that had experienced the most intense interethnic conflict over natural resources. The “particularist” assertion of Native American identity had not been in contradiction to a “universalist” project to bring together Native and non-Native communities. Interethnic unity strategies based solely on universalist commonalties (such as environmental protection) tend to fail without a concurrent process of equalization that respects particularist differences (such as Native treaty rights). Most strategies for ethnic conflict management focus on the national scale and the common bond of political citizenship. Ethnic conflict managers have not paid adequate attention to local or regional territorial identity as one strategy for addressing socially based conflict in multiethnic settings. A territorially based, multiethnic “place membership” may be more effective than “state citizenship” in lessening ethnic conflict and increasing cooperation between local communities.
机译:本文比较了1970年代至2000年代在华盛顿,俄勒冈,内华达州,蒙大拿州,蒙大拿州,南达科他州,明尼苏达州和威斯康星州的美洲原住民与农村白人(特别是牧场主,农民和渔民)的联盟。它断言,族裔间合作的水平是保护多族裔农村地区运动成败的关键因素。这篇论文探讨了为什么某些农村白人和土著人民如何以及为什么联合起来保护以前曾是他们之间冲突根源的自然资源(例如鱼或水)。诸如矿山,水坝,发电厂,输电线路,飞行或轰炸范围之类的外部威胁,促进了本地原住民社区与非原住民社区之间的新联系。联盟重新定义了社区边界,将邻近的种族“局外人”定义为依靠共同自然资源或土地基础的“局内人”。这些“包容性地理”在经历了最激烈的自然资源种族间冲突的地区更为明显。 “特别主义者”对美国原住民身份的主张与“普遍主义者”将土著人和非本地人社区集合在一起的项目并不矛盾。仅基于普遍主义共性(例如环境保护)的民族间团结战略往往会失败,而没有同时尊重平等者差异的平等化进程(例如土著条约权利)。大多数种族冲突管理策略都集中在国家规模和政治公民的共同纽带上。作为解决多民族环境中基于社会的冲突的一种策略,种族冲突管理者对本地或区域领土身份没有给予足够的重视。在减少种族冲突和增加地方社区之间的合作方面,基于领土的多种族“场所成员身份”可能比“国家公民身份”更为有效。

著录项

  • 作者

    Grossman, Zoltan Charles.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Geography.; Sociology Ethnic and Racial Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 p.2652
  • 总页数 559
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然地理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号