首页> 外文学位 >A space for divinity in post-structuralism: Post-structuralism and liberal theology (be)coming together in Spirit.
【24h】

A space for divinity in post-structuralism: Post-structuralism and liberal theology (be)coming together in Spirit.

机译:后结构主义的神性空间:后结构主义和自由神学在圣灵中融为一体。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

'Post-structuralism' has become a buzz-word in academia. The notion of multiple truths and the idea that there is no underlying or overarching thing constituting reality seem to appeal to many minds today. With respect to theology, post-structuralism has been characterized as atheistic in part because of its critique of the idea of a transcendent Being.;Post-structuralism challenges Christianity to rethink its theology. Is it even possible to be a post-structuralist theologian? While some theologians shy away from post-structuralism because they believe it will force them to give up God, other theologians see the value in engaging post-structuralist thought in theology. I argue that theologians cannot afford to ignore the challenges posed by post-structuralism. The only way for theology to remain relevant and to correct the injustices perpetuated by theological concepts is to put forward post-structuralist theology as an appropriate development toward which liberal theology should strive. Post-structuralism not only should not be ignored, it should be embraced.;In order to further conversation between post-structuralist philosophy and modern liberal theology, I develop a theology of post-structuralist Spirit, in which Spirit is multiple, immanent, infinite, intimate, rhizomatic, material, and performative. I depend on Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, who critique transcendence and uphold immanence and multiplicity, and Judith Butler, who provides valuable insights through the concept of performativity and analysis of power relations, to construct this Spirit.;Through an exploration of the way in which liberal and progressive theologians, such as Catherine Keller and Michael Welker, transform the traditional Holy Spirit, I conclude by demonstrating that there are promising connections to be made between my post-structuralist theology of Spirit and certain notions of the Holy Spirit. Some of these connections will be found in the work of Michael Welker and Catherine Keller. I posit a post-structuralist theology of Spirit as God and demonstrate the ways in which this post-structuralist Spirit illuminates and resonates with the future of contemporary reinterpretations of the Holy Spirit in liberal theology.
机译:“后结构主义”已成为学术界的流行语。如今,许多真相吸引了多个真理的概念以及没有构成现实的根本或根本事物的观念。关于神学,后结构主义之所以被描述为无神论,部分原因是它对超然存在的观念提出了批评。后结构主义向基督教提出挑战,以重新思考其神学。甚至有可能成为后结构主义的神学家?尽管一些神学家因为相信会迫使他们放弃上帝而回避了后结构主义,但其他神学家却认为将后结构主义思想纳入神学是有价值的。我认为神学家不能忽视后结构主义所带来的挑战。使神学保持相关性并纠正神学概念永久存在的不公正现象的唯一方法是提出后结构主义神学,作为自由神学应努力争取的适当发展。后结构主义不仅应该被忽略,而且应该被接受。;为了进一步在后结构主义哲学和现代自由神学之间进行对话,我发展了后结构主义精神的神学,其中精神是多重的,内在的,无限的。 ,亲密,根际,物质和表现。我依靠吉尔斯·德勒兹(Gilles Deleuze)和费利克斯·瓜塔里(Felix Guattari)(他们批判超越,坚持内在性和多样性)以及朱迪思·巴特勒(Judith Butler)(通过绩效和权力关系的分析提供宝贵的见识)来构建这种精神。我以证明凯瑟琳·凯勒(Catherine Keller)和迈克尔·韦尔克(Michael Welker)等自由和进步的神学家改变了传统的圣灵的方式总结了这一点,并指出在我的后结构主义神学与某些圣灵概念之间存在着有希望的联系。其中一些联系将在Michael Welker和Catherine Keller的著作中找到。我提出了精神作为上帝的后结构主义神学,并论证了这种后结构主义精神如何阐明和共鸣当代自由主义神学对圣灵的重新诠释的未来。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stephenson, Andrea M.;

  • 作者单位

    The Claremont Graduate University.;

  • 授予单位 The Claremont Graduate University.;
  • 学科 Religion Philosophy of.;Philosophy.;Theology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 293 p.
  • 总页数 293
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:28

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号