首页> 外文学位 >Examining an art portfolio assessment using a many -facet Rasch measurement model.
【24h】

Examining an art portfolio assessment using a many -facet Rasch measurement model.

机译:使用多方面Rasch测量模型检查艺术品投资组合评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine an art portfolio assessment system for measuring student art abilities. The art portfolio assessment system included: (1) faculty that assigned 12 portfolio projects aligned with curriculum objectives, (2) 15 commercial art students that completed these projects at a New England community technical college, (3) a validity committee that monitored rater severity/leniency, (4) 10 professional graphic designers that rated student art projects, (5) and a statistical framework for analysis of project ratings. Professional graphic designers rated student art projects using a scoring rubric that included art project design criteria, four rating dimensions assessing specific aspects of the project, and a 5-point rating scale. Each student portfolio received ratings from three randomly assigned raters. A many-facet Rasch model (MFRM) was used as the statistical framework to analyze student ability, project difficulty, rater severity, and rating dimension difficulty.;Three students' art abilities were over-estimated and three students were under-estimated on the basis of raw score averages. The MFRM adjusted the student ability measure for the rater severity/leniency and changed the ranking of the six students accordingly. Rater severity/leniency was found to be significant with a reliability of separation index of .93, and inter-rater agreement of 43.3 percent. Raters failed to distinguish differences in the rating dimensions with a reliability of separation index of .73. Rating scale categories were consistently selected at the same category 42 percent of the time. Project difficulty and the rating dimension difficulty components had no effect on student ability ranking.;Content validity was addressed as an integral aspect of the art portfolio assessment system; construct validity was examined from the rank ordering of item difficulty; and internal validity was calibrated for each component providing evidence that the data fit the MFRM. The art portfolio assessment system using the MFRM as the statistical framework provided measures of student art ability that were free of subjective judgments.
机译:这项研究的目的是研究一种用于评估学生艺术能力的艺术作品集评估系统。艺术档案袋评估系统包括:(1)教师分配了12个符合课程目标的档案袋项目;(2)15名在新英格兰社区技术学院完成这些项目的商业艺术学生;(3)监督评估者严重性的有效性委员会/宽大(4)对学生艺术项目进行评级的10位专业图形设计师,(5)和用于项目评级分析的统计框架。专业的平面设计师使用评分标准对学生艺术项目进行评分,评分标准包括艺术项目设计标准,评估项目特定方面的四个评分维度以及5分评分等级。每个学生档案袋均从三个随机分配的评估者那里获得评估。使用多方面Rasch模型(MFRM)作为统计框架来分析学生的能力,项目难度,评估者的严重性和评分维度的难度。;在评估上,三个学生的艺术能力被高估,而三个学生的艺术能力被低估原始分数平均值的基础。 MFRM针对评估者的严重程度/宽大程度调整了学生能力测度,并相应地更改了六名学生的排名。评估者的严重度/宽大度很重要,分离指数的可靠性为0.93,评估者之间的一致性为43.3%。评分者未能以0.73的分离指数来区分评分维度上的差异。在42%的情况下,始终在同一类别中选择评分量表类别。项目难度和等级维度难度成分对学生能力等级没有影响。内容有效性被视为艺术作品集评估系统的组成部分;从项目难度的等级顺序检验构造效度;并且对每个组件的内部有效性进行了校准,以提供证明数据符合MFRM的证据。使用MFRM作为统计框架的艺术作品评估系统提供了对学生艺术能力的测量,而没有主观判断。

著录项

  • 作者

    Turner, Jere.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston College.;

  • 授予单位 Boston College.;
  • 学科 Art education.;Educational tests measurements.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 130 p.
  • 总页数 130
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号