首页> 外文学位 >Making the fittest culture: Social Darwinism and American naturalist writing at the turn of the twentieth century.
【24h】

Making the fittest culture: Social Darwinism and American naturalist writing at the turn of the twentieth century.

机译:打造最合适的文化:20世纪初,社会达尔文主义和美国自然主义者的著作。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I explore Jack London, Edith Wharton, and Henry Adams's portrayal of evolution as a cultural narrative, a narrative open to multiple and conflicting interpretations. Going beyond the rather narrow readings of social Darwinism offered by most naturalist scholars, I show that the lack of a scientific consensus about the definition of social Darwinism (for it could, I argue, be seen as any cultural application of evolutionary theory) and its social value, enabled London, Wharton, and Adams to have a more significant voice in debates about social Darwinism than scholars have allowed. The first chapter addresses how neither older nor more recent approaches have identified the multiple interpretations of social Darwinism and the strategies that these writers use to evaluate them; the following chapters examine how each writer tests the ideological assumptions that shape the social meanings of evolutionary theory. Chapter two considers London's argument in The Call of the Wild (1903) for biological kinship between humans and dogs and how this argument is informed by the violence of national history---the conquering of the frontier---and dreams of national expansion. Chapter three focuses on how Edith Wharton's The House of Mirth (1905) challenges London's acceptance of scientific principles for human behavior by showing the ways that debates about natural selection and the biological inheritance of memories and behaviors are informed by dominant cultural assumptions about class and gender. Chapter four examines Henry Adams's The Education of Henry Adams (1907) and later scientific essays, showing his frequent shifting between evolution and physics to develop a scientific reading of history which questions evolutionary progress. These writers, individually and collectively, not only capture a particularly contentious moment in the development of evolutionary thought in American society, but also shed light on how the meanings of evolution become freighted with cultural values and attitudes.
机译:我将探讨杰克·伦敦,伊迪丝·沃顿和亨利·亚当斯对进化的描绘,将其描述为一种文化叙事,是对多种矛盾的解释开放的叙事。我超越了大多数自然主义学者对社会达尔文主义的狭义解读,我发现,关于社会达尔文主义的定义缺乏科学共识(因为我认为它可以看作是进化论的任何文化应用)及其社会价值使伦敦,沃顿商学院和亚当斯在有关社会达尔文主义的辩论中拥有比学者所允许的更为重要的声音。第一章论述了既不古老也不较新的方法如何识别社会达尔文主义的多重解释以及这些作者用来评估它们的策略。以下各章探讨了每位作者如何检验影响进化论社会意义的意识形态假设。第二章讨论伦敦在《野性的呼唤》(1903)中关于人与狗之间的生物亲属关系的论点,以及该论点如何通过国家历史的暴力(征服边疆)和国家扩张的梦想而得到体现。第三章重点讨论伊迪丝·沃顿的《欢乐之屋》(1905年)如何通过展示关于阶级和性别的主流文化假设来说明关于自然选择以及记忆和行为的生物遗传学的辩论的方式,来挑战伦敦对人类行为的科学原理的接受。 。第四章考察了亨利·亚当斯(Henry Adams)的《亨利·亚当斯的教育》(The Education of Henry Adams)(1907)和后来的科学论文,显示了他在进化与物理学之间的频繁转换以发展对历史的科学解读,这对进化的进步提出了质疑。这些作家,无论是个人还是集体,不仅捕捉了美国社会进化思想发展中一个特别有争议的时刻,而且阐明了进化的含义是如何被文化价值和态度所载运的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bruni, John P.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 Literature American.;American Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 191 p.
  • 总页数 191
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:00

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号