首页> 外文学位 >The political foundations of development: State and party formation in Malaysia and Thailand.
【24h】

The political foundations of development: State and party formation in Malaysia and Thailand.

机译:发展的政治基础:马来西亚和泰国的国家和政党组建。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The central analytical puzzle my dissertation asks is why some countries in the developing world have pursued a trajectory of equitable development while others have not. Focusing on two countries within Southeast Asia---Malaysia and Thailand---I seek to explain why Malaysia has done significantly better than Thailand in the areas of income distribution, rural development, taxation, health, and education.; I argue that the variation in equitable development between these two Southeast Asian countries can be traced to the historical formation of different types of political structure, specifically of states and political parties. Malaysia's achievements in equitable development stem from the formation of a "hegemonic-corporatist" state---a polity that combines the discipline, institutionalization, and penetration of an ethnic party, the competence of a coherent bureaucracy, and the moderation of a multi-ethnic governing coalition. This type of state has developed through four formative historical waves dating from the colonial period to the early 1970s. Thailand's weaker record in equitable development is due to the ubiquity of a "hegemonic-bureaucratic state"---a polity that is dominated primarily by the military and that gives little room for the institutionalization of party politics. The inability of parties to represent social interests has been shaped by a cycle of military rule going back to the 19th century reforms of King Chulalongkorn. By tracing the roots of equitable development to a historical process of state and party formation, this dissertation asserts that the origins and structure of institutions are key to an understanding of politics in the developing world.; This dissertation contributes to literature in the comparative-historical tradition as well as to studies of social and economic policy. Data on the policies examined in this study---taxation and spending, rural development, education, and health---is based on fifteen months of fieldwork research in Thailand and Malaysia. While this study is primarily focused on theory-building and empirical analysis, it also carries policy implications for advancing equitable development.
机译:我的论文提出的核心分析难题是,为什么发展中国家中的一些国家追求公平发展的轨迹,而另一些国家却没有。我着眼于东南亚的两个国家(马来西亚和泰国),以解释为什么马来西亚在收入分配,农村发展,税收,卫生和教育方面的表现要比泰国好得多。我认为,这两个东南亚国家之间公平发展的差异可以追溯到不同类型的政治结构,特别是国家和政党的历史形成。马来西亚在公平发展方面的成就源于“霸权主义的集权主义”国家的形成,这种国家将纪律,制度化和族裔政党的渗透,统一的官僚机构的能力以及多党制的适度结合起来。民族统治联盟。这种状态是通过四次形成性的历史浪潮发展起来的,这些浪潮可以追溯到殖民时期到1970年代初。泰国在公平发展方面的较弱的记录是由于“霸权-官僚国家”的普遍存在-这种政体主要由军方控制,政党政治制度化的空间很小。政党无法代表社会利益的原因是军事统治的循环可以追溯到19世纪朱拉隆功国王的改革。通过将公平发展的根源追溯到国家和政党形成的历史过程,本文断言,制度的起源和结构是理解发展中国家政治的关键。本文为比较历史传统文学以及社会经济政策研究做出了贡献。本研究中研究的政策数据(税收和支出,农村发展,教育和卫生)基于泰国和马来西亚进行的15个月的实地研究。虽然这项研究主要侧重于理论构建和实证分析,但它也对促进公平发展具有政策意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kuhonta, Erik Martinez.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton University.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Sociology Social Structure and Development.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 417 p.
  • 总页数 417
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;社会结构和社会关系;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号