首页> 外文学位 >Longitudinal analysis of teacher education: The case of history teachers.
【24h】

Longitudinal analysis of teacher education: The case of history teachers.

机译:教师教育的纵向分析:以历史教师为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the United States, learning history has traditionally been rooted in a transmission-oriented view of teaching and learning. From this perspective, teachers transfer their historical knowledge to their students. Alternatively, this dissertation positions itself within constructivist theories of teaching and learning, where learning is a process of knowledge construction and students make meaning from their experiences. This dissertation seeks to advance our understanding of how social studies teachers with constructivist beliefs learn to teach school history and the influence that teacher education has, or does not have, on their constructivist beliefs and related practices. This interpretive study employed a multiple-case design that examined the development of four beginning history teachers over time. Data were collected longitudinally from the beginning of the participants' student teaching until the end of their first year in the classroom.;Through a qualitative cross-case analysis of interviews, observations, classroom artifacts, and written reflections, this study had several key findings. First, issues of historical content knowledge and classroom control were major barriers for implementation of constructivist-oriented practices in beginning teachers' classrooms. Second, contrary to some previous studies, learning to teach in transmission-oriented contexts did not result in the diminishing of beginning teachers' constructivist beliefs. Through reflective practice, these teachers used their experiences to advance their understanding of teaching. Third, although these teachers developed strong conceptual tools in their teacher preparation program, they expressed a lack of practical tools, which could have helped them better and more frequently use constructivist-oriented practices in their classroom. Finally, lack of practical tools expanded into the teachers' inability to teach for historical thinking and historical inquiry, two constructivist-oriented concepts in history education.
机译:在美国,学习历史传统上源于以传播为导向的教学观。从这个角度讲,教师将他们的历史知识传授给学生。另外,本论文也将自己置于建构主义的教学理论之中,在这种理论中,学习是知识建构的过程,而学生则从他们的经验中获取意义。本论文旨在增进我们对具有建构主义信仰的社会研究教师如何学习教学校历史以及教师教育对其建构主义信仰和相关实践的影响的认识。这项解释性研究采用了多案例设计,研究了随着时间的推移,四位初始历史老师的发展情况。从参加者的教学开始到他们在教室的第一年结束时,都是从纵向收集数据;通过对访谈,观察,教室文物和书面反思进行定性的跨案例分析,该研究有几个关键发现。首先,历史内容知识和课堂控制问题是在初学者的课堂上实施建构主义实践的主要障碍。第二,与以前的一些研究相反,在传播导向的背景下学习教学并没有减少初任教师的建构主义信念。通过反思性练习,这些老师利用他们的经验来加深对教学的理解。第三,尽管这些教师在他们的教师预备课程中开发了强大的概念工具,但他们表示缺乏实用的工具,这可能有助于他们更好地,更频繁地在课堂上使用面向建构主义的实践。最后,缺乏实用工具导致教师无法进行历史思维和历史探究,这是历史教育中两个面向建构主义的观念。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Boston University.;

  • 授予单位 Boston University.;
  • 学科 Education Teacher Training.;History General.;Education Social Sciences.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 369 p.
  • 总页数 369
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号