首页> 外文学位 >A comparison study of online interaction strategies as perceived by online learners and instructors and the effect of previous online learning experience on preferences for online interaction.
【24h】

A comparison study of online interaction strategies as perceived by online learners and instructors and the effect of previous online learning experience on preferences for online interaction.

机译:在线学习者和讲师所感知的在线交互策略的比较研究,以及以前的在线学习经验对在线交互偏好的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Considered as the latest generation of distance education, online education fully employs the power of the Internet and brings education to a new era. It is expected that the online learner's population will constantly grow and more and more institutions will enter this field in the near future. This prediction is supported by many studies and reports. Because research has proven that interaction is an important component in a successful online course, searching for effective instructional strategies to foster appropriate online interaction is getting more and more attention. This study is designed to generate information about the online learners' and online instructors' attitudes toward four interaction attributes---content interaction, conversation and collaboration interaction, intrapersonal/metacognitive skills, and performance support.; Three primary objectives are included in this study: (1) to identify the most important factors in each type of interaction as perceived by online learners; (2) to determine the order of the four types of interaction strategies in terms of the significance perceived by the student participants; and (3) to resolve whether previous online learning experience has effect on the learners' assessment of each type of interaction strategies and their overall evaluation of all strategies. Two sample groups, (1) online students who enrolled in the spring 2003 semester of the Idaho Virtual Campus at the University of Idaho, and (2) online instructors with limited or extensive online teaching experience who use the IVC system to deliver their online courses, were chosen for this investigation. Cronbach Alpha and factor analysis were used to check the instrument's reliability and validity; descriptive statistics, multiple regression, and one-way MANOVA were used to answer this study's research questions. An item-by-item comparison of the survey results learners without previous online learning experience and the online learners with previous online learning experience in the relative importance of the four interaction attributes and the overall strategy evaluation. The results of the ANOVAs disclosed that the difference actually only exists in the performance support attribute. As expected, the online learners without previous online experience demanded more supports than the online learners with previous learning experience.; In general, the survey responses of the instructor participants revealed similar perspectives on every strategy as those of the student participants. The interviews with the instructor participants also confirmed this discovery. However, some noticeable mean differences (mean difference >+/- .50) still existed between the two groups. Therefore, the next questions are how to realize the identified interaction strategies in online courses and how the recognition gap between online students and instructors could be narrowed.
机译:在线教育被认为是最新一代的远程教育,它充分利用了互联网的力量,并将教育带入了一个新时代。预计在线学习者的人数将不断增长,并且越来越多的机构将在不久的将来进入这一领域。许多研究和报告都支持这种预测。由于研究已经证明交互是成功在线课程的重要组成部分,因此寻求有效的教学策略以促进适当的在线交互正受到越来越多的关注。本研究旨在生成有关在线学习者和在线教师对四个交互属性的态度的信息,这些交互属性是:内容交互,对话和协作交互,人际/认知能力和绩效支持。这项研究包括三个主要目标:(1)识别在线学习者所认为的每种互动类型中最重要的因素; (2)根据学生参与者感知的重要性,确定四种互动策略的顺序; (3)解决以前的在线学习经验是否对学习者对每种交互策略类型的评估以及对所有策略的整体评估是否有影响。两个样本组,(1)在爱达荷大学爱达荷州虚拟校园2003春季学期入学的在线学生,以及(2)使用IVC系统交付在线课程的在线教学经验有限或丰富的在线教师被选中进行这项调查。使用Cronbach Alpha和因子分析来检查仪器的可靠性和有效性。描述性统计,多元回归和单向MANOVA用于回答本研究的研究问题。在没有四种在线交互经验和整体策略评估的相对重要性的情况下,逐项比较没有先前在线学习经验的调查结果学习者和具有先前在线学习经验的在线学习者。方差分析的结果表明,差异实际上仅存在于性能支持属性中。不出所料,没有先前在线经验的在线学习者比具有先前学习经验的在线学习者需要更多的支持。一般而言,对教师参与者的调查回答显示出与学生参与者在每种策略上的相似观点。对讲师参加者的采访也证实了这一发现。但是,两组之间仍然存在一些明显的均值差异(均值差异> +/- .50)。因此,接下来的问题是如何实现在线课程中确定的交互策略,以及如何缩小在线学生与教师之间的识别差距。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chang, Tzu-shu.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Idaho.;

  • 授予单位 University of Idaho.;
  • 学科 Education Adult and Continuing.; Education Technology.; Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 238 p.
  • 总页数 238
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 成人教育、业余教育;教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:12

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号