首页> 外文学位 >Diurnal differences in common electrocardiographic indices of arrhythmic liability in normal telemetered dogs and telemetered dogs with failing hearts: Implications for safety pharmacology and veterinary cardiology.
【24h】

Diurnal differences in common electrocardiographic indices of arrhythmic liability in normal telemetered dogs and telemetered dogs with failing hearts: Implications for safety pharmacology and veterinary cardiology.

机译:正常遥测犬和心脏衰竭的遥测犬心律失常的常见心电图指数的昼夜差异:对安全药理学和兽医心脏病学的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The assessment of the electrocardiogram (ECG) liabilities is a key component in both clinical medicine and safety-pharmacology. However, despite the known circadian dependence of both pro-arrhythmic substrates and prevalence of arrhythmias, the optimal time for the ECG evaluation remains undetermined. In fact the time of day of the recording is seldom considered in the interpretation. This study assessed circadian changes in ECG parameters in a well-defined telemetered canine model. Diurnal differences were sought between normal dogs and dogs with failing hearts (i.e., with reduced ejection fraction and elevated NTproBNP) but not in heart failure (i.e., asymptomatic). Methods of analyzing ECGs from (the relatively few) dogs with clinical heart failure are not of great concern, since dogs so afflicted have clear echocardiographic and other clinical evidence of disease. So this study was directed more at (the much greater number of) dogs with subclinical disease, where standard methods are more equivocal, difficult to perform, and expensive.;Healthy male dogs (n = 9) and male dogs with failing hearts (n=10) were instrumented for telemetered ECG recordings at rest (1-hour epochs) during periods of low (2AM) and high autonomic activation (6PM and 6AM); heart rates (HR), indices of cardiac conduction (PQ, QRS) and repolarization duration (QT, QTcF) as well as heart rate variability (RRSD), repolarization instability (QTSTV) and steepness of restitution (QT/TQ) were evaluated at each time-point. Data are mean +/- SD and were compared (ANOVA). The number of dogs entered into this study was determined a priori to produce a power of ∼0.8 to detect 15% differences in parameters having coefficients of variation of 25% with an alpha of 0.05.;In both groups, at 2 AM, heart rates were slower and more variable while the PQ interval was longer, indicating strong parasympathetic control. No notable circadian differences in ventricular conduction (QRS duration) were found in either normal dogs or dogs with failing hearts. For normal dogs, no notable differences were found in ventricular repolarization (QT, QTcF) or repolarization variability (QTSD, QT-STV). Though in normal dogs, ventricular restitution (QT: TQ) showed some differences, these are not considered to be of clinical relevance. For dogs with failing heart, no notable differences were found in repolarization variability (QTSD, QT-STV) or ventricular restitution (QT: TQ). The QT-interval was longer at night, but rate-corrected QT duration did not change.;These data strongly indicate lack of notable diurnal differences in ECG markers of arrhythmic liability and their underlying physiology between normal dogs and dogs with failing hearts but no clinical signs of cardiac disease. Dogs with failing hearts had significantly longer QTc(F) and higher short term variability in QT, both indicators of a potential for a torsadomorphic ventricular arrhythmia. Furthermore, TQ interval was significantly shorter for dogs with failing hearts, but QT only had a tendency to prolong, thus the QT: TQ only had a tendency to prolong. This is an indicator for a non-torsadomorphic, reentrant ventricular arrhythmia, which is known to develop in more severe heart failure. It may be postulated, then, that millions of dogs with failing hearts may develop a risk for ventricular arrhythmia, and may be candidates to receive compounds (e.g., beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors) prophylactic against the development. Although there were no differences of significance in parameters of HRV between normal dogs and dogs with failing hearts, dogs with failing hearts tended to have: higher heart rates at 2 AM and 6 AM, and had higher coefficients of variation of almost all parameters. This finding, also, might indicate value for prophylaxis against the pathophysiology that occurs with more advanced heart disease and leads to morbidity and mortality.
机译:心电图(ECG)负债的评估是临床医学和安全药理学的关键组成部分。然而,尽管已知前心律不齐的底物的昼夜节律依赖性和心律不齐的患病率,但心电图评估的最佳时间仍未确定。实际上,在解释中很少考虑录制的时间。这项研究评估了定义良好的遥测犬模型中ECG参数的昼夜节律变化。在正常犬和心脏衰竭(即射血分数降低和NTproBNP升高)的犬之间寻求昼夜差异,但在心脏衰竭(即无症状)中则没有。分析(相对较少)患有临床心力衰竭的狗的心电图的方法并不是人们所关心的,因为患病的狗具有明确的超声心动图和其他疾病的临床证据。因此,本研究更多地针对亚临床疾病的狗(数量更多),其中标准方法更加模棱两可,执行困难且价格昂贵。;健康的雄性狗(n = 9)和心脏衰竭的雄性狗(n = 9) = 10)被用于在低(2AM)和高自主神经激活(6PM和6AM)期间静止(1小时)进行遥测ECG记录;心率(HR),心脏传导指数(PQ,QRS)和复极化持续时间(QT,QTcF)以及心率变异性(RRSD),复极化不稳定(QTSTV)和恢复陡度(QT / TQ)进行了评估每个时间点。数据是平均值+/- SD,并进行了比较(ANOVA)。先验确定进入这项研究的狗的数量,以产生〜0.8的功效,以检测变异系数为25%(α为0.05)的参数中的15%差异;两组中,凌晨2点,心率PQ间隔较长时,速度较慢且变化较大,表明强烈的副交感神经控制。在正常狗或心脏衰竭的狗中均未发现明显的昼夜节律变化(QRS持续时间)。对于正常犬,在心室复极(QT,QTcF)或复极变异性(QTSD,QT-STV)方面未发现明显差异。尽管在正常犬中,室性恢复(QT:TQ)显示出一些差异,但这些差异不具有临床意义。对于心脏衰竭的狗,复极变异性(QTSD,QT-STV)或心室恢复(QT:TQ)没有发现显着差异。夜间的QT间隔更长,但经过速率校正的QT持续时间没有改变;这些数据强烈表明,正常狗和心脏衰竭但无临床表现的狗之间,心律失常的ECG标记及其潜在的生理功能缺乏明显的昼夜差异心脏病的迹象。心脏衰竭的狗的QTc(F)显着更长,而QT的短期变异性更高,这两个指标均可能显示了类反圆形室性心律失常。此外,心脏衰竭的狗的TQ间隔明显缩短,但是QT仅具有延长的趋势,因此QT:TQ仅具有延长的趋势。这是非torsadomorphic折返性室性心律失常的指标,已知该病会在更严重的心力衰竭中发展。因此,可以假定数百万只心脏衰竭的狗可能会发展出室性心律失常的风险,并可能成为接受预防这种发展的化合物(例如,β受体阻滞剂,ACE抑制剂)的候选人。尽管正常犬与心脏衰竭犬之间的HRV参数没有显着性差异,但心脏衰竭犬往往具有以下特点:在2 AM和6 AM时心率较高,几乎所有参数的变异系数都较高。这一发现也可能表明预防更严重的心脏病并导致发病和死亡的病理生理学的价值。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Veterinary science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 185 p.
  • 总页数 185
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:44:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号